# Gun Laws  01/14/2013

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gun-laws-01-14-2013/266013>\
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\
**Created:** [January 14, 2013, 9:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gun-laws-01-14-2013/266013 "2013-01-14T21:27:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 80

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Omega](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/omega/32/6425_2.png) [@Omega](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Omega)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2013, 4:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gun-laws-01-14-2013/266013/80 "2013-01-15T16:03:49Z")

</div>

> [@me\>bikes](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/me-bikes/50968/11):
>
> Could possibly pass as a thumb hole stock.
> 
> I give it a year and someone will develop an AR15 variant that is compliant and not called an AR15. Was there a limit on round holding capacity with a fixed magazine? If not, you could have a rifle that holds 50-rounds and is now legal. Bring it on. I’m all for new looking firearms.

Technically it’s not a thumbhole. The stock is separate from the buffer tube. Just sayin.

From my understanding NOTHING that holds more than 7. And if it was designed to hold 10, it needs to be fixed at 7.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gun-laws-01-14-2013/266013)._