# Has anyone ever seen an awesome C4 vette?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [October 5, 2010, 1:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175 "2010-10-05T13:24:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:09am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/141 "2010-10-07T09:09:55Z")

</div>

There are very few 80’s-early 90’s cars that don’t suck. I mean, just to compare:  
The Mustang of the same time period:  
 ![http://mustangview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/1984-mustang-svo.jpg](http://mustangview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/1984-mustang-svo.jpg)  
Dodge Charger:

 ![http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Plymouth_Duster_EEK.jpg/800px-Plymouth_Duster_EEK.jpg](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Plymouth_Duster_EEK.jpg/800px-Plymouth_Duster_EEK.jpg)  
Porsche 944:  
 ![http://pictures.topspeed.com/IMG/crop/200602/1982-porsche-944-2_460x0w.jpg](http://pictures.topspeed.com/IMG/crop/200602/1982-porsche-944-2_460x0w.jpg)  
E30 M3:  
 ![http://images.paultan.org/images/History_M3_E30_5.jpg](http://images.paultan.org/images/History_M3_E30_5.jpg)  
I would take a C4 over all of them. Looks and performance wise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![66impalass](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/66impalass/32/7429_2.png) [@66impalass](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/66impalass)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/142 "2010-10-07T09:10:31Z")

</div>

EDIT: I fucked up

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XwalkerX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/xwalkerx/32/7598_2.png) [@XwalkerX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/XwalkerX)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/143 "2010-10-07T09:13:47Z")

</div>

> [@Joe](#):
>
> I would take a C4 over all of them. Looks and performance wise.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHHAHAH!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joelster](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joelster/32/7258_2.png) [@joelster](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/joelster)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:15am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/144 "2010-10-07T09:15:17Z")

</div>

[quote=“drvnkd,post:139,topic:161175"”]

I do not remember them being a big deal. I have seen some that I liked for some reason, and others that I hated.

I can’t begin to imagine how slow they were in the 80’s. I feel that my dads C5 is slow too.  
my 3y/o: “Go faster”  
me: “I can’t”  
☹

[/quote]

Again it is all relative. In the 80’s if you went to Lancaster’s 1/8th mile and ran a low 9, you had a pretty quick car. A Lamborghini Countach would run a low 14/high 13 in the 1/4 mile. Same with a Ferrari 328 (think Magnum PI), that ran low 14’s, Porsche 911’s all ran in the 14’s unless you stepped up to the Turbo ones which ran mid/high 13’s. The Corvette was right in the mix.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Garick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8797f3/32.png) [@Garick](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Garick)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:16am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/145 "2010-10-07T09:16:34Z")

</div>

Not really feeling the black wheels on the gs but I don’t mind c4’s too much.

![http://www.nyspeed.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16424&d=1286467869](http://www.nyspeed.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16424&d=1286467869)

![http://www.nyspeed.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16425&d=1286467882](http://www.nyspeed.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16425&d=1286467882)

![http://www.nyspeed.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16426&d=1286468113](http://www.nyspeed.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16426&d=1286468113)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:16am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/146 "2010-10-07T09:16:43Z")

</div>

I assume you’re talking about the E30 M3? Lets see, a square shitbox with under 200hp and an ugly wing that ran 15’s, or a 2-seater with an LT1 and 100more hp that I think looks a lot better and ran a high 13- low 14.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/147 "2010-10-07T09:21:12Z")

</div>

last I checked, the mustang and that charger aren’t even NEARLY in the same league as the corvette was…cost/performance wise. Nobody in right mind would buy a fox body mustang and expect it to perform well in stock trim either. People buy them to turn them into fast drag cars.

The E30 ///M is badass, but a completely different car. The porsche 944 isn’t realy a good comparison either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joelster](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joelster/32/7258_2.png) [@joelster](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/joelster)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/148 "2010-10-07T09:23:43Z")

</div>

> [@boardjnky4](#):
>
> The E30 ///M is badass, but a completely different car. The porsche 944 isn’t realy a good comparison either.

You are right, they both cost a lot more than the Corvette. Not a good comparison at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/149 "2010-10-07T09:25:38Z")

</div>

There wasn’t really a whole lot of competition for the C4. I wasnt saying those were direct competitors per se, I was saying that was what passed as high performance. The manufacturers only cared about gas mileage. The ZR1’s ran against supercars and the regular ones were priced above the pony cars and below the exotic imports. Maybe the 911 carrera even though it was more expensive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carnut](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/carnut/32/7590_2.png) [@Carnut](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Carnut)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/150 "2010-10-07T09:31:24Z")

</div>

> [@XwalkerX](#):
>
> needs to have TFI

Cease fire injection FTL

> [@Joe](#):
>
> There are very few 80’s-early 90’s cars that don’t suck. I mean, just to compare:  
> The Mustang of the same time period:  
>   
> Dodge Charger:
> 
> ![http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Plymouth_Duster_EEK.jpg/800px-Plymouth_Duster_EEK.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/c/8/c892550df679832bf383a9fc629b96f46c69c107.jpeg)  
> Porsche 944:  
> ![http://pictures.topspeed.com/IMG/crop/200602/1982-porsche-944-2_460x0w.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/c/a/caa2d8ae886b3560110287b5cf7cb8e2f139f769.jpeg)  
> E30 M3:  
> ![http://images.paultan.org/images/History_M3_E30_5.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/9/a/9a4f84964d95a1999029f84faa9e8259a57add6b.jpeg)  
> I would take a C4 over all of them. Looks and performance wise.

Have you moved from hooker and blow to just Crack for lunch?

The older c4’s didn’t have LT1s. They sucked. Even with the LT1’s they sucked.

I don’t think the M3 and the Vette are in the same league and in terms of performance, cost, reliability, or anything. Especially in the terms of panty dropping looks. I dont know any woman except someone who grew up in that era (which are now 45+ or some stupid poor broads) who think these look good.

Hell, I would take the SVO mustang (what you listed) over the vette any day as well. Shit, turbo nigga, crank the boost, bye bye vette. These things sucked. Having worked on them many times when working in a chevy dealership I can hands down say that these were the worst cars to work on and no one wanted to work on them because everything was broken or everything broke when you touched it. The interiors fell apart, god have mercy on your soul if you tried to do anything under the dash board, the door cill was a fucking wall!

These things were a GM abortion that lived.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/151 "2010-10-07T09:34:05Z")

</div>

I wouldn’t take any of those cars. Vette included. Short of a Ferrari/Lambo/high-end Porsche etc I wouldn’t take anything stock from 1980- ~1992. My point was missed which was that everything sucked compared to now and sucking less is OK when graded on a curve.

I mean, check out the suck on the Car and Driver 10 Best list from that era.  
1985  
Price cap: $30,000

Model Times on List  
Audi 5000 S/Turbo 5  
Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 1  
Chevrolet Corvette 14  
Dodge Caravan 3  
Honda CRX 2  
Honda Civic 6  
Honda Prelude 10  
Honda Accord 23  
Merkur XR4Ti 1  
Plymouth Voyager 3  
Pontiac 6000 STE 3  
Porsche 944 4

Fastest car tested: Chevrolet Corvette, 150 mph

Top-selling cars:

Chevrolet Cavalier  
Ford Escort  
Chevrolet Celebrity

1986  
Price cap: $30,000

Model Times on List  
Audi 5000 CS Turbo Quattro 5  
Chevrolet Corvette 14  
Ford Taurus 7  
Honda Prelude 10  
Honda Accord 23  
Lincoln Mark VII LSC 1  
Mercury Sable 3  
Porsche 944 Turbo 4  
Saab 9000 Turbo 4  
Toyota MR2 2  
Volkswagen GTI 6

Fastest car tested: Porsche 944 Turbo, 157 mph

Top-selling cars:

Chevrolet Celebrity  
Ford Escort  
Chevrolet Cavalier

1987  
Price cap: $30,000

Model Times on List  
Acura Integra 6  
Audi 5000 CS Turbo 5  
Chevrolet Corvette 14  
Ford Mustang GT 5  
Ford Taurus 7  
Honda Accord 23  
Mazda RX-7 Turbo 5  
Pontiac Bonneville SE 1  
Saab 9000 Turbo 4  
Toyota MR2 2  
Volvo 740

Fastest car tested: Ferrari Testarossa, 176 mph

Top-selling cars:

Ford Escort  
Ford Taurus  
Chevrolet Cavalier  
1988  
Price cap: $35,000

Model Times on List  
Acura Legend Coupe 3  
Acura Integra 6  
Audi 5000 5  
Chevrolet Corvette 14  
Ford Mustang 5 5  
Ford Taurus 7  
Honda CRX 2  
Honda Civic 6  
Honda Accord 23  
Saab 9000 Turbo 4

Fastest car tested: Ferrari Testarossa, 173 mph

Top-selling cars:

Ford Escort  
Chevrolet Corsica/Beretta  
Ford Taurus  
1989

Price cap: $35,000

Model Times on List  
Acura Legend Coupe 3  
Chevrolet Corvette 14  
Dodge Colt Turbo 1  
Ford Probe GT 3  
Ford Taurus 7  
Honda Civic 6  
Honda Accord 23  
Lincoln Continental 1  
Mitsubishi Mirage Turbo 1  
Mitsubishi Eclipse Turbo 4  
Plymouth Laser Turbo 4  
Saab 9000 Turbo 4

Fastest car tested: 750iL V12, 158 mph

Top-selling cars:

Honda Accord  
Ford Taurus  
Ford Escort  
1990

Price cap: $35,000

Model Times on List  
Acura Legend Coupe 3  
Eagle Talon Turbo 3  
Ford Taurus 7  
Honda Civic 6  
Honda Accord 23  
Lexus LS 1  
Mazda MPV 2  
Mazda Miata 10  
Mercury Sable 3  
Mitsubishi Eclipse Turbo 4  
Nissan Maxima SE 3  
Nissan 300ZX Turbo 7  
Plymouth Laser Turbo 4

Fastest car tested: Chevrolet Corvette ZR-1, 175 mph

Top-selling cars:

Honda Accord  
Ford Taurus  
Chevrolet Cavalier

1991  
New rule: No more than two places per marque.

Price cap: $35,000

Model Times on List  
Eagle Talon Turbo 3  
Ford Taurus 7  
Honda Civic 6  
Honda Accord 23  
Mazda MPV V6 2  
Mazda Miata 10  
Mercury Tracer LTS 1  
Mercury Sable 3  
Mitsubishi Eclipse Turbo 4  
Nissan Sentra SE-R 4  
Nissan 300ZX Turbo 7  
Plymouth Laser Turbo 4  
Toyota Previa 1

Fastest car tested: Chevrolet Corvette ZR-1, 176 mph

Top-selling cars:

Honda Accord  
Ford Taurus  
Toyota Camry

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Motocrossx23](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/motocrossx23/32/5120_2.png) [@Motocrossx23](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Motocrossx23)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/152 "2010-10-07T09:38:55Z")

</div>

^ like most of the population on here…OH SNAP!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theblue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/theblue/32/5074_2.png) [@theblue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/theblue)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 9:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/153 "2010-10-07T09:46:13Z")

</div>

this one does look good:

![http://e-bsm.com/shop/images/CORVETTE_MC4F.jpg](http://e-bsm.com/shop/images/CORVETTE_MC4F.jpg)

but it just looks very strange to see an asian guy driving a C4 vette…

has anybody on here ever seen an asian man driving a C4 vette in person before?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rugsr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rugsr/32/7474_2.png) [@rugsr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rugsr)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 10:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/154 "2010-10-07T10:13:57Z")

</div>

a C4 no…but a C5 yes. no one wnats a C4.  
My buddy sold his C4 2yrs ago and started talking about picking up another vette.  
He mentioned a C4 and not a C5 due to his lack of funds.  
I reminded him how shity his C4 was and that he should just save up a liiiiiitle more and pick up a C5.  
.  
.  
.  
“remember how crapy that car was”  
.  
.  
.“yea your right, ill wait”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carnut](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/carnut/32/7590_2.png) [@Carnut](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Carnut)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 10:16am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/155 "2010-10-07T10:16:29Z")

</div>

Joe, understandable.

Id still take the M3 any day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wahoo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/wahoo/32/8265_2.png) [@Wahoo](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Wahoo)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 12:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/156 "2010-10-07T12:20:29Z")

</div>

GNX

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 12:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/157 "2010-10-07T12:23:30Z")

</div>

I couldnt see newman running a GNX…too many people like them :lol:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wahoo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/wahoo/32/8265_2.png) [@Wahoo](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Wahoo)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 12:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/158 "2010-10-07T12:26:09Z")

</div>

If I recall they were faster in a straight then the vette of the same year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![9c1ny](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/9c1ny/32/5050_2.png) [@9c1ny](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/9c1ny)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 12:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/159 "2010-10-07T12:41:29Z")

</div>

A real GNX is serious cash, dont forget about the 3.8L Turbo Trans Am also…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fry](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fry/32/7284_2.png) [@Fry](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Fry)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2010, 12:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175/160 "2010-10-07T12:46:48Z")

</div>

I’ve got an irrational hardon for G bodies, but otherwise the 80’s into the early 90’s pretty much sucked. Digital electronics were in their awkward teenage years. 5.0 V8’s made 140hp. Sedans were RWD and sports cars were FWD. GM tried shit like the Cadillac Allante and Saturn. It was just the automotive lost decade. The only cool cars that came out of it are the bastard children that we selectively like for no good reason other than a fond childhood memory.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175.md?page=7)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/has-anyone-ever-seen-an-awesome-c4-vette/161175.md?page=9)
