# Help Settle an Argument.

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/help-settle-an-argument/25162>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [February 27, 2007, 12:27am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/help-settle-an-argument/25162 "2007-02-27T00:27:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2007, 5:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/help-settle-an-argument/25162/10 "2007-02-27T05:36:56Z")

</div>

[quote=“JEG,post:9,topic:25162"”]

not without a warrent. The only time they are allowed to search a car without permission or a warrent is if they have reasonable cause or something. Like if they see a glock on your dash or you stink of weed. They can’t just search for no reason.

[/quote]

+1. But if they really suspect you have drugs (like you’re acting all nervous, refusing a search, in a car that isn’t yours), they can make you sit there until the K9 comes and sniffs around your car. If the dog alerts then they can call a judge for a warrant and make you sit there the entire time. Pretty much any judge in the world will sign a search warrant once a drug dog has alerted.

Back on point though, I’m going with C.

Police do it all the time with apartments. Two people live together, person A is a criminal, person B isn’t. Both people have the right to grant consent to search, at least in the “common areas”. If person A has a pound of cocaine on the coffee table, and the cops show up saying person B is allowing them in the apartment, person A is fucked.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/help-settle-an-argument/25162)._