# Hey guys, I figured out how to devide by 0 (Rotary content) **URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hey-guys-i-figured-out-how-to-devide-by-0-rotary-content/250014 **Category:** Shift518 Automotive **Created:** [January 29, 2010, 12:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hey-guys-i-figured-out-how-to-devide-by-0-rotary-content/250014 "2010-01-29T00:04:34Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 32
### Author: ![Boxersix](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/boxersix/32/6327_2.png) [@Boxersix](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boxersix) #### Post date: [January 29, 2010, 1:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hey-guys-i-figured-out-how-to-devide-by-0-rotary-content/250014/32 "2010-01-29T13:43:21Z")
> [@OFFICIAL Buffalo Sabres Thread](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-buffalo-sabres-thread/25170/5198): > > anything engineered for twice it’s actual power output will last a long time. > > you have seen a FEW rotaries last 200k+, probably could count them on one hand. > > you put 100 wankels on stands next to 100 piston engines and let them run and I’d put money on more than double the amount of piston motors running after 100k than rotaries. Stock for stock…I’d take you on that bet. The rotors in the rotary “spin” 1/3rd the RPM of the actual eccentric and induce less wear than compared to a piston with side loading. On top of that the lack of all the moving parts in a valve train is less to worry about. Given proper fuel and oil in such a test you’d likely be very surprised. Since such a test will never happen, you and I wil never exchange monies on such a bet :tongue Rotaries fail because of asshats pushing them way beyond their design limits(ones that are VERY tough to make better), or subjected tuning for that matter. The only true thing that completely blows about a rotary is it’s fuel consumption. That’s pretty much it. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hey-guys-i-figured-out-how-to-devide-by-0-rotary-content/250014)._