# History of the SHO and what could have been...

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/history-of-the-sho-and-what-could-have-been/16238>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 21, 2006, 8:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/history-of-the-sho-and-what-could-have-been/16238 "2006-08-21T08:55:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slow84ta](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slow84ta/32/7265_2.png) [@slow84ta](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slow84ta)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2006, 5:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/history-of-the-sho-and-what-could-have-been/16238/14 "2006-08-21T17:18:52Z")

</div>

> [@JustinH](#):
>
> interesting read, thanks. The sho motor was ahead of its time for sure, but on todays standards its kinda blah…

:word: kind of like the LT5, but those still are pretty impressive :gotme:

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/history-of-the-sho-and-what-could-have-been/16238)._