# Honestly, I think my numbers are BS

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/honestly-i-think-my-numbers-are-bs/242867>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [March 17, 2009, 4:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/honestly-i-think-my-numbers-are-bs/242867 "2009-03-17T16:24:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 177

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deadbeatrec](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/deadbeatrec/32/6401_2.png) [@deadbeatrec](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/deadbeatrec)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2009, 8:59am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/honestly-i-think-my-numbers-are-bs/242867/177 "2009-03-19T08:59:20Z")

</div>

> [@Anyone into overclocking?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-into-overclocking/15835/5):
>
> thats completely false. my UNCORRECTED numbers were 346/344 while my SAE correction was 366/364 from moon on their mustang dyno. uncorrected means thats what your car made right then and there in those conditions… all a correction factor does is adjust for what it may make at sea level or at some other elevation or to be “bragging rights”. it makes what it makes. as ive been told for years. corrected numbers are bullshit.

holy shit travis, maybe ur not worthless after all. :number1

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/honestly-i-think-my-numbers-are-bs/242867)._