# How can Sony possibly justify this pricetag?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-can-sony-possibly-justify-this-pricetag/38289>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [November 6, 2007, 11:29am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-can-sony-possibly-justify-this-pricetag/38289 "2007-11-06T11:29:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nikuk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/nikuk/32/7254_2.png) [@Nikuk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Nikuk)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2007, 7:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-can-sony-possibly-justify-this-pricetag/38289/21 "2007-11-08T19:51:57Z")

</div>

[quote=“walter,post:8,topic:38289"”]

Because going from 60" to 70" is a heck of a lot different than going from 50" to 60"

[/quote]

:word:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dmoffitt](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/dmoffitt/32/7455_2.png) [@dmoffitt](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/dmoffitt)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2007, 8:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-can-sony-possibly-justify-this-pricetag/38289/22 "2007-11-08T20:01:22Z")

</div>

1080p, 120Hz, 10-bit color = $$$$$

(but I’d still take a Sharp AQUOS)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maksim2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/dec6dc/32.png) [@Maksim2000](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Maksim2000)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2007, 8:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-can-sony-possibly-justify-this-pricetag/38289/23 "2007-11-08T20:47:47Z")

</div>

[quote=“dmoffitt,post:22,topic:38289"”]

(but I’d still take a Sharp AQUOS)

[/quote]

On good signal, AQUOS is cheaper and as good. On bad (read cable or satellite) sony XBR wins due to much better processor.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-can-sony-possibly-justify-this-pricetag/38289.md?page=1)