# How Deep Are You In: $how Me The Money

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-deep-are-you-in-how-me-the-money/247175
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic
**Created:** [September 29, 2009, 5:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-deep-are-you-in-how-me-the-money/247175 "2009-09-29T05:55:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 41

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![OsoiNA6](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/osoina6/32/6301_2.png) [@OsoiNA6](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OsoiNA6)
#### Post date: [September 29, 2009, 8:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-deep-are-you-in-how-me-the-money/247175/41 "2009-09-29T08:13:54Z")

</div>

> [@Why did Ford Lose 12 BILLION dollars](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-did-ford-lose-12-billion-dollars/23693/22):
>
> I just like playing devils advocate.
> 
> In this case your OP was to find out what ratio of a persons income was put into their car based on a one year income level.
> 
> In my case I am stating that by adding one extra math step you get an actual semi-accurate result rather than one that is light-years away from even being close.
> 
> Shame on me for not wanting to take a test in which I answer all questions correctly but only get a score of 35.

Your conclusion that adding one math step gets a more accurate result is not valid in each case, so to make that generalization is not accurate.

Why don’t you make another thread with your detailed analysis and calculations, see how many people answer it, then we compare notes?

If you don’t want to answer the question because you feel it’s all inaccurate and a waste of your time, that’s fine I have no issues with that.

But claiming to have a superior method while knocking others down in a condescending manner- well not many people appreciate that.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-deep-are-you-in-how-me-the-money/247175)._
