# HP and Torque ratings of bike engine?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [September 28, 2005, 6:48pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839 "2005-09-28T18:48:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonny\_Montrose](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ac8455/32.png) [@Jonny\_Montrose](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jonny_Montrose)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 6:48pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/1 "2005-09-28T18:48:55Z")

</div>

Hey guys I’ve been scouring the internet trying to find HP and torque figures of bike engines and specifically NOT harley engines. I’m looking for sportbike numbers. Anyone that’s got a bike can you help me out. Thanks.

JM

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rx3](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rx3/32/7194_2.png) [@Rx3](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Rx3)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2005, 7:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/2 "2005-09-28T19:21:18Z")

</div>

From [Motorcycle-USA.com:](http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/Article_Page.aspx?ArticleID=2086&Page=1)

![http://photos.motorcycle-usa.com/superbikehp.jpg](http://photos.motorcycle-usa.com/superbikehp.jpg)

![http://photos.motorcycle-usa.com/superbiketorque.jpg](http://photos.motorcycle-usa.com/superbiketorque.jpg)

That’s power directly to the rear wheel. The crank HP numbers are higher, closer to 190hp on average.

Most of the 2006 bikes coming out next month should have a 20-30% increase in horsepower and torque. 😃

You could always go to the manufacturer websites of each manufacturer for the crank numbers as well. Google is your friend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carnut](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/carnut/32/7590_2.png) [@Carnut](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Carnut)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2005, 6:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/3 "2005-09-29T06:51:10Z")

</div>

Could not find shit on the manufacturers site

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![King](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/king/32/7329_2.png) [@King](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/King)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2005, 6:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/4 "2005-09-29T06:53:56Z")

</div>

back when they had 130 to the crank those were disgustingly fast…everyone is gonna die on 06 bikes

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rx3](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rx3/32/7194_2.png) [@Rx3](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Rx3)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2005, 1:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/5 "2005-09-29T13:24:54Z")

</div>

> [@Carnut](#):
>
> Could not find shit on the manufacturers site

Probably because they all are releasing the '06 models in the next few weeks. They kind of play games with not listing HP for a while. Happens this time of year all the time. :shrug:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonny\_Montrose](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ac8455/32.png) [@Jonny\_Montrose](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jonny_Montrose)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2005, 4:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/6 "2005-10-01T16:00:56Z")

</div>

Thank you Rick. I knew I could count on you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Deuce](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/deuce/32/7614_2.png) [@Deuce](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Deuce)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2005, 4:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/7 "2005-10-01T16:17:01Z")

</div>

thats pretty sick

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Coldaccord](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/coldaccord/32/7272_2.png) [@Coldaccord](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Coldaccord)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2005, 4:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/8 "2005-10-01T16:38:11Z")

</div>

> [@K Cuv](#):
>
> back when they had 130 to the crank those were disgustingly fast…everyone is gonna die on 06 bikes

shit my 600 putting down low 100s at the wheel was nuts

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rx3](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rx3/32/7194_2.png) [@Rx3](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Rx3)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2005, 7:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/9 "2005-10-01T19:08:17Z")

</div>

> [@Jonny Montrose](#):
>
> Thank you Rick. I knew I could count on you.

Anytime. 👋

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_GSR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c37758/32.png) [@The\_GSR](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/The_GSR)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2005, 7:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/10 "2005-10-01T19:37:52Z")

</div>

it looks just like a honda engine dyno

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Coldaccord](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/coldaccord/32/7272_2.png) [@Coldaccord](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Coldaccord)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2005, 9:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/11 "2005-10-01T21:16:33Z")

</div>

mmm 13k?..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Janny](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/janny/32/7594_2.png) [@Janny](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Janny)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2005, 10:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/12 "2005-10-01T22:08:56Z")

</div>

I like how the yama-line is the longest. poor ducati.  
they should make yamaha cereal… so I could eat them for breakfast.

:snky:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mike125k](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mike125k/32/7282_2.png) [@mike125k](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/mike125k)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2005, 6:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/13 "2005-10-02T06:35:58Z")

</div>

the Duck is a V-twin, thats why its RPM ranges are alot lower.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_GSR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c37758/32.png) [@The\_GSR](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/The_GSR)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2005, 2:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/14 "2005-10-02T14:14:04Z")

</div>

> [@Coldaccord](#):
>
> mmm 13k?..

I was refering to the high hp and low torque not redline

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zong](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/zong/32/7580_2.png) [@Zong](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zong)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2005, 3:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hp-and-torque-ratings-of-bike-engine/2839/15 "2005-10-02T15:36:23Z")

</div>

![http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v230/zg326/humandeath.jpg](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v230/zg326/humandeath.jpg)  
.
