# Hyundai Genesis 2.0T puts down 197 WHP and 227 lbft stock

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [March 17, 2009, 1:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665 "2009-03-17T13:49:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Viper966](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/viper966/32/7268_2.png) [@Viper966](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Viper966)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 7:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/41 "2009-03-18T07:03:57Z")

</div>

> [@ultradriver10000](#):
>
> Main competition? Looks like an underdog right out the gates.
> 
> Why don’t we talk about GM’s turbo 4cylinder? 260/260 or upgrade it from the factory to 300+…oh yah the stock car dyno’s at 250 hp and weighs in at 2900 pounds!
> 
> durka
> 
> durka
> 
> wrong wheel drive, but 400 pounds lighter and 50+ wheel hp
> 
> mohomid
> 
> jehad

The cobalt is only competition if you are a high school girl… and you like driving a rental car every day (not syaing it breaks, reffering to quality)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![longuyen88](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/longuyen88/32/7611_2.png) [@longuyen88](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/longuyen88)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 7:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/42 "2009-03-18T07:12:03Z")

</div>

people who complain about the whp seem to forget that this is RWD. And did you see the exhaust restrictions? I wouldn’t be surprised they limited this engine a lot so it doesn’t get into the v6 territory.

RWD \> FWD anyday

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 7:14am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/43 "2009-03-18T07:14:18Z")

</div>

> [@longuyen88](#):
>
> RWD \> FWD anyday  
> 00 Civic Si  
> 08 Accord Sedan

:eyebrow:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 7:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/44 "2009-03-18T07:30:00Z")

</div>

> [@JaysGreenLX](#):
>
> Hello??? 2.0l 4cyl Turbo, stock. Nearly 200 whp is not bad at all.

OMGZ displacement vs HP debate

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SoloIIscoob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/35a633/32.png) [@SoloIIscoob](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SoloIIscoob)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 7:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/45 "2009-03-18T07:34:50Z")

</div>

> [@JaysGreenLX](#):
>
> Hello??? 2.0l 4cyl Turbo, stock. Nearly 200 whp is not bad at all.

my stock 1999 4cyl turby put down 258 hp and 272TQ with a new transmission(used) and 5 owners later:picard:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LZ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@LZ1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/LZ1)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 7:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/46 "2009-03-18T07:41:50Z")

</div>

> [@Pass McGass](#):
>
> They’re rated @ 210 at the crank, and they’re making only 13hp less than that at the wheels. While it’s not super fucking amazing, it’s still pretty decent. At least it’s not like the Rx8’s rated hp compared it’s actual :lol:

My Firebird rated at 305 put down 340with headers/intake…so its safe to assume it dynoed 305 stock 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![newman](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/newman/32/7569_2.png) [@newman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/newman)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 7:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/47 "2009-03-18T07:48:12Z")

</div>

OMG FACTORY FREAK!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultradriver10000](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ultradriver10000/32/7397_2.png) [@ultradriver10000](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ultradriver10000)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 7:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/48 "2009-03-18T07:55:00Z")

</div>

> [@Viper966](#):
>
> The cobalt is only competition if you are a high school girl… and you like driving a rental car every day (not syaing it breaks, reffering to quality)

If you honestly think the interior of the Genesis is that much better then the Cobalt then you and I have vast differences of what an interior should be in a sports car.

That is what this is talking about right? A sports car; a quick, light, well handling car no?

Just checking, both cars have cheapo plastic interiors I don’t care if one plastic is more contoured with tighter fits then the other, they are both shitty plastic.

I guess I’d rather be a high school girl passing the bros in the Genesis…

(I think your comparison of a girl driving a Cobalt is funny coming from a Hyundai Tiburon guy. :P)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Viper966](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/viper966/32/7268_2.png) [@Viper966](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Viper966)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 8:16am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/49 "2009-03-18T08:16:40Z")

</div>

> [@ultradriver10000](#):
>
> If you honestly think the interior of the Genesis is that much better then the Cobalt then you and I have vast differences of what an interior should be in a sports car.
> 
> That is what this is talking about right? A sports car; a quick, light, well handling car no?
> 
> Just checking, both cars have cheapo plastic interiors I don’t care if one plastic is more contoured with tighter fits then the other, they are both shitty plastic.
> 
> I guess I’d rather be a high school girl passing the bros in the Genesis…
> 
> (I think your comparison of a girl driving a Cobalt is funny coming from a Hyundai Tiburon guy. :P)

and i think you talking about the merits of interior quality is funny coming from a corvette guy…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![93dx\_hatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/9/90ced4/32.png) [@93dx\_hatch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/93dx_hatch)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 8:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/50 "2009-03-18T08:22:59Z")

</div>

I hate Hyundais just as much as I hate cobalts, as a neutral 3rd party, the genesis interior is much better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![POOPRA](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/poopra/32/7188_2.png) [@POOPRA](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/POOPRA)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 8:33am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/51 "2009-03-18T08:33:49Z")

</div>

I guess the real test is how the engine holds up when you start cranking up the boost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![somedude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecd19e/32.png) [@somedude](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/somedude)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 9:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/52 "2009-03-18T09:07:04Z")

</div>

> [@POOPRA](#):
>
> I guess the real test is how the engine holds up when you start cranking up the boost.

isn’t the engine based off of the Mitsubishi engine not the evo but the one below it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Viper966](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/viper966/32/7268_2.png) [@Viper966](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Viper966)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 9:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/53 "2009-03-18T09:12:42Z")

</div>

> [@POOPRA](#):
>
> I guess the real test is how the engine holds up when you start cranking up the boost.

koreans have already seen ~ 500 WHP with 35r’s and pistons

> [@somedude](#):
>
> isn’t the engine based off of the Mitsubishi engine not the evo but the one below it?

yea, cept this one is an open deck, where as teh evo is semi closed… .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultradriver10000](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ultradriver10000/32/7397_2.png) [@ultradriver10000](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ultradriver10000)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2009, 10:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/54 "2009-03-18T10:12:48Z")

</div>

> [@Viper966](#):
>
> and i think you talking about the merits of interior quality is funny coming from a corvette guy…

Whom also has a M3 as a Daily :shrug:

> [@Viper966](#):
>
> yea, cept this one is an open deck, where as teh evo is semi closed… .

Do you think this block will be the limiting factor, such as some of the for 302s?

Split personality?

How does the rest of the car hold up to 500hp? Subframe/tranny/rear end etc…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![halas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/898d66/32.png) [@halas](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/halas)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2009, 8:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/55 "2009-03-20T20:27:16Z")

</div>

> [@somedude](#):
>
> isn’t the engine based off of the Mitsubishi engine not the evo but the one below it?

Its Korean which means its based off of everything on the market today that can be easily changed enough to avoid any patent/copyright lawsuits!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![91MR2](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/91mr2/32/7217_2.png) [@91MR2](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/91MR2)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2009, 8:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/56 "2009-03-20T20:31:33Z")

</div>

I’m impressed so far…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![reliant\_turbo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/reliant_turbo/32/7189_2.png) [@reliant\_turbo](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/reliant_turbo)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2009, 6:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/57 "2009-03-21T06:39:58Z")

</div>

> [@somedude](#):
>
> isn’t the engine based off of the Mitsubishi engine not the evo but the one below it?

no. this engine is a group effort between mitsu, hyundai and chrysler and all of them are using it with different manifolds and small changes. i heard that mitsu did some different portwork and vvt though.

the evo, the caliber SRT and the genesis coupe should have similar strength engines. caliber gets the 2.4L turbo version. wonder if that would swap into the genesis coupe.

Brian

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sweet89s13](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/87869e/32.png) [@sweet89s13](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/sweet89s13)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2009, 7:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/58 "2009-03-21T07:49:35Z")

</div>

why are you guys comparing a genesis to a cobalt ss? how about sticking with a a direct competitor like a solstice or a sky? (which will be short lived) but as a direct competitor way better lb/hp and same format fr.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tunerfreak](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tunerfreak/32/7427_2.png) [@Tunerfreak](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Tunerfreak)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2009, 7:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/59 "2009-03-21T07:54:04Z")

</div>

> [@sweet89s13](#):
>
> why are you guys comparing a genesis to a cobalt ss? how about sticking with a a direct competitor like a solstice or a sky? (which will be short lived) but as a direct competitor way better lb/hp and same format fr.

how are the solstice and sky a direct competitor? cobalt seems right to me

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![longuyen88](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/longuyen88/32/7611_2.png) [@longuyen88](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/longuyen88)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2009, 9:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665/60 "2009-03-21T09:58:55Z")

</div>

cobalt is in the same price range but again, its fwd.

You have to think of a cheap, RWD, TURBO coupe that can compare to this car. I can’t think of any.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hyundai-genesis-2-0t-puts-down-197-whp-and-227-lbft-stock/64665.md?page=4)
