# I guess they were right...

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-guess-they-were-right/187865>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [February 5, 2007, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-guess-they-were-right/187865 "2007-02-05T20:09:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlueZ06](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/5f9b8f/32.png) [@BlueZ06](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlueZ06)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2007, 9:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-guess-they-were-right/187865/25 "2007-02-06T09:20:26Z")

</div>

> [@Why i bought SMG](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-i-bought-smg/27794/2):
>
> Ummm, how does your theory account for ice melting at rapid rates at both poles?  
> Also:  
> Warm oceans emitting carbon dioxide?  
> Carbon dioxide depleting the ozone?  
> Ozone emmision form vehicles?  
> Ozone emission from the ocean?
> 
> You do also realize that the majority of scientists today are not pointing toward the ozone, or lack thereof, as a cause of “global warming.”

you do realize carbon dioxide concentration causes a temperature warm up correct?

I can tell you’ve never researched this theory that most of the scientific community is in consensus with.

Can you state the name of one accredited scientist who will speak on behalf of global warming being caused by vehicle emissions, and industry not associated with green peace? My money is on you cannot.

Most people who youve seen speak recently on this subject are not even educated in the matter, but are mere delegates with their own political agendas.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-guess-they-were-right/187865)._
