# intake manifold porting

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intake-manifold-porting/71685>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 6, 2009, 5:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intake-manifold-porting/71685 "2009-08-06T05:35:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carnut](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/carnut/32/7590_2.png) [@Carnut](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Carnut)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2009, 9:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intake-manifold-porting/71685/21 "2009-08-07T21:03:34Z")

</div>

His manifold is a skunk 2 which is already pretty thin in that area. There is 3 to 4 mm of material between the TB bore and the IACV port. Opening the bore to 68mm would mean removing 2mm of material around the entire bore. While it can be done it’s a little risky for a setup that really wouldn’t require it. If you were to break through on the port the IACV wouldn’t work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Toda\_Party](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/toda_party/32/7354_2.png) [@Toda\_Party](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Toda_Party)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2009, 9:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intake-manifold-porting/71685/22 "2009-08-07T21:42:29Z")

</div>

man just boost it and stop worrying about this bullshit 😛

didn’t make the #'s u were expecting? no prob bob, turn up the boooooooooooost

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intake-manifold-porting/71685.md?page=1)
