# Intel \> AMD **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [May 26, 2006, 10:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-amd/12567 "2006-05-26T10:47:10Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![BuickGN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/buickgn/32/7200_2.png) [@BuickGN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BuickGN)\ **Post date:** [May 26, 2006, 10:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-amd/12567/2 "2006-05-26T10:48:05Z")
yeah ok, and whats a botty? BTW. We first learned of Conroe’s alleged performance when our Editor-In-Chief, David Ross, managed to gain access to a set of [benchmarks](http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=4843) that showed a 2.66GHz model soundly beating an overclocked AMD Athlon FX-60 in every test. But some of us took the staggeringly impressive results with a substantial pinch of salt. After all, they were produced in strict Intel-controlled conditions with who-knows-what optimisations present. If you’ve not done so already, you might want to take a peek [here](http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=4843) at those numbers. I think ill wait till HardOCP or some reputable review site does it, and not believe something that was tested in an intel lab.lol Its neverending this speed shit, lol. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-amd/12567)._