# Intel vs AMD - The Real Numbers

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd-the-real-numbers/25967>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [March 16, 2007, 10:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd-the-real-numbers/25967 "2007-03-16T10:03:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RuBiCaNT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rubicant/32/7622_2.png) [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2007, 11:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd-the-real-numbers/25967/10 "2007-03-16T11:52:13Z")

</div>

[quote=“JaysGreenLX,post:9,topic:25967"”]

Precisely…:wtf:

[/quote]

AMD has integrated memory controller into the CPU rather than outside whereas Intel is using an external memory controller. AMD has designed the Hammer architecture to be highly scalable.

Intel has a better CPU manufacturing process. They can fit more CPU’s on a CPU wafer since each CPU is built with a smaller process. Because of that, they can crank out more CPUs at a cheaper price and still make more money.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd-the-real-numbers/25967)._
