# Intel vs AMD

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [April 14, 2009, 8:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181 "2009-04-14T20:30:46Z")
**Posts on this page:** 19
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@Janus](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Janus)
#### Post date: [April 14, 2009, 8:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/1 "2009-04-14T20:30:46Z")

</div>

This more pertains to integrated graphics. Assume 4g of SSD2 RAM.

which is a more preferable solution:  
Intel with the 4500 integrated graphics accelerator  
AMD with the 3200 ATI Radeon integrated unit

both processors would be 2.0-2.4ghz

I do no gaming whatsoever, the occational DVD watching, office-type documentation, pdf files, research, so nothing graphics intensive

an aside: if i have 3d rendered anatomy programs, is a stand alone GPU a better idea?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)
#### Post date: [April 14, 2009, 8:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/2 "2009-04-14T20:32:18Z")

</div>

not going to make any difference man

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ZOMGVTEK](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/zomgvtek/32/5063_2.png) [@ZOMGVTEK](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ZOMGVTEK)
#### Post date: [April 14, 2009, 8:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/3 "2009-04-14T20:34:09Z")

</div>

AMD if youre forcing yourself into integrated video.

The Intel 4500 is very, very poor. The AMD 3200 is only very poor. The margins are very minimal here, however.

I would never consider using either of them in a computer for any purpose, whatsoever.

Your average $50 video card will outperform them many times over. Then you wont be struggling to play youtube ‘HD’ videos.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/3bc359/32.png) [@Jon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jon)
#### Post date: [April 14, 2009, 8:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/4 "2009-04-14T20:40:29Z")

</div>

Stand alone GPU is always a better idea,I’d say it wouldn’t be worth it if you were just doing basic computing,being that you mention 3D rending I’d say its worth it.

But that’s not really a AMD vs Intel Debate,more of a onboard vs card debate.

AMD seems like they’re back on track with processors now,according to the toms hardware benchmarks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@Janus](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Janus)
#### Post date: [April 14, 2009, 9:00pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/5 "2009-04-14T21:00:48Z")

</div>

i wouldnt be doing the rendering persay, but the programs i have avalible to me have pretty cool layering features ect, and i dont know how graphically intense that is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![benji86](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/benji86/32/7309_2.png) [@benji86](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/benji86)
#### Post date: [April 15, 2009, 3:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/6 "2009-04-15T03:19:38Z")

</div>

you’re going to want an onboard card.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Joe](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/joe/32/7219_2.png) [@Joe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Joe)
#### Post date: [April 15, 2009, 5:32am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/7 "2009-04-15T05:32:54Z")

</div>

Get the Intel, since their processors run circles around AMD these days, then take the $25 hit to pick up something like this. [http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125251](http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125251)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@Janus](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Janus)
#### Post date: [April 15, 2009, 5:37am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/8 "2009-04-15T05:37:16Z")

</div>

forgive me, im not very tech savvy…  
if the motherboard has an integrated graphics card, what does that do when an external GPU is installed? I suppose I would much rather pick up a laptop with a card already in it, drivers installed ect

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JustinH](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9fc29f/32.png) [@JustinH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JustinH)
#### Post date: [April 15, 2009, 5:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/9 "2009-04-15T05:38:43Z")

</div>

You just disable the onboard video when you add a real video card in it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sickboy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7ea924/32.png) [@sickboy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/sickboy)
#### Post date: [April 15, 2009, 5:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/10 "2009-04-15T05:40:44Z")

</div>

I assume you’re looking at laptop integrated graphics… MHD4500 is going to perform very poor, like ZOMGVTEK said, and Radeon 3200 is still poor but significantly better, so go with that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@Janus](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Janus)
#### Post date: [April 15, 2009, 6:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/11 "2009-04-15T06:22:11Z")

</div>

yeah like i said, im trying to just address my needs with a computer. i started out wanting every feature possible, but then i realized i probably need less than what im looking at. haha WAY too many toys out there to have

and to reiterate… 0 gaming. the most complicated thing it might do is a 3d anatomy program with layering

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@Janus](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Janus)
#### Post date: [April 18, 2009, 7:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/12 "2009-04-18T19:02:00Z")

</div>

GOT IT!  
Thank God haha. I was freaking out about it but finally pulled the trigger and am very happy. With the coupon i was well under my 1000 price line, and i tacked on a total coverage 3 yr with accident protection warranty. I was having an issue with coupons not being stackable with online discounts… this 250 off 1099.00 was stackable so it worked out great. 🙂

Your customized PC includes:

- HP Pavilion dv3z Entertainment PC
- Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1 (64-bit)
- AMD Turion™ X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile Processor ZM-84 (2.3GHz, L2 Cache)
- 4GB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm)
- 500GB 5400RPM SATA Hard Drive with HP ProtectSmart Hard Drive Protection
- ATI Radeon™ HD 3200 Graphics with 64MB Display Cache Memory
- 13.3" diagonal WXGA High-Definition HP LED BrightView Widescreen Display (1280 x 800)
- Slot Load Super Multi 8X DVD+/-R/RW w/Double Layer Support
- Webcam + Fingerprint Reader
- Wireless-G Card with Bluetooth
- Full Size Backlit Keyboard
- 9 Cell Lithium Ion Battery
- $10 OFF!! System Recovery DVD with Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium (64-bit)
- Microsoft® Works 9.0
- HP Home & Home Office Store in-box envelope

Product description Product # Qty Your  
extended  
price  
HP Pavilion dv3z Entertainment PC FJ745AV 1  
$702.99

Summary of discounts for order H106797858:

Instant discounts you received:

$250.00 Coupon NB3984  
$150.00 Notebook instant rebate  
$70.00 PC+ESP instant rebate  
$60.00 PC+ESP instant rebate

NY Tax:  
Shipping:  
Grand total: $56.24  
Free  
$759.23

You may receive another e-mail confirming the other portion of your order.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BillysRevenge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b9e5f3/32.png) [@BillysRevenge](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BillysRevenge)
#### Post date: [April 18, 2009, 8:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/13 "2009-04-18T20:03:46Z")

</div>

Looks like a similar setup to the HP I got…Looks like a pretty solid machine, nice buy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@Janus](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Janus)
#### Post date: [April 19, 2009, 7:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/14 "2009-04-19T07:35:21Z")

</div>

i woke up this morning thinking i should have gone with the wireless-n but then i thought i wouldnt ever notice the difference

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JustinH](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9fc29f/32.png) [@JustinH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JustinH)
#### Post date: [April 19, 2009, 7:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/15 "2009-04-19T07:55:40Z")

</div>

You can always swap the minipci card out in the laptop, or put an external n card in there if you want it.

Do you already have an N router?

I’m waiting for the N standard to become final before I buy the hardware.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@Janus](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Janus)
#### Post date: [April 19, 2009, 10:09am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/16 "2009-04-19T10:09:16Z")

</div>

thats why i opted not to get it. i dont have the hardware, and as of now, neither does the school im going to

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BillysRevenge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b9e5f3/32.png) [@BillysRevenge](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BillysRevenge)
#### Post date: [April 19, 2009, 10:14am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/17 "2009-04-19T10:14:35Z")

</div>

IT would be dumb to get wireless-n until it is a standard.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![boxxa](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/boxxa/32/5045_2.png) [@boxxa](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boxxa)
#### Post date: [April 19, 2009, 4:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/18 "2009-04-19T16:37:25Z")

</div>

There is no point to buy a wireless N router unless you are looking for network coverage.

Anytime someone tells me that G is too slow for thier home internet I want to punch them in the face.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BillysRevenge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b9e5f3/32.png) [@BillysRevenge](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BillysRevenge)
#### Post date: [April 19, 2009, 5:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/intel-vs-amd/66181/19 "2009-04-19T17:08:43Z")

</div>

> [@boxxa](#):
>
> There is no point to buy a wireless N router unless you are looking for network coverage.
> 
> Anytime someone tells me that G is too slow for thier home internet I want to punch them in the face.

The guy at best buy said G is too slow so it must be true :shrug:
