# Jaguar C-XF concept (precursor to S-Type replacement)

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [December 22, 2006, 9:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038 "2006-12-22T21:53:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedGoober4Life](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redgoober4life/32/7610_2.png) [@RedGoober4Life](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RedGoober4Life)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2006, 9:53pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/1 "2006-12-22T21:53:07Z")

</div>

> **[Oh No You Di'int! Jaguar C-XF Photos Hit, C&D Scoop Thwarted!](https://jalopnik.com/223987/oh-no-you-diint-jaguar-c-xf-photos-hit-cd-scoop-thwarted)**
>
> Hoo boy. We're just going to hide out in Miss Kitty's room, lest we get caught in tonight's saloon gunfight between Edmunds "Take That, Tree Killer" Inside Line and Car "We Bitchslapped the Interweb" and Driver....

I hope the actual car looks somewhat like it.

Jaguar seems to not be going down without a fight:

> **[2007 Jaguar XKR](https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2007-jaguar-xkr-road-test)**
>
> The Cat's Pajamas. Surprise, surprise: Jaguar's supercharged feline is no dozing house cat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MPD47](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mpd47/32/7383_2.png) [@MPD47](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MPD47)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2006, 10:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/2 "2006-12-22T22:07:53Z")

</div>

A car that aggressive looking needs to be a coupe. However, I hate the current XK series, so fucking ugly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedGoober4Life](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redgoober4life/32/7610_2.png) [@RedGoober4Life](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RedGoober4Life)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2006, 10:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/3 "2006-12-22T22:29:46Z")

</div>

Not at all. This is a throwback to the groundbreaking designs Jaguar was once known for.

Well, this isn’t really groundbreaking, but certainly fresh.

And I like the new XK. It’s certainly a prettier car than those German things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MPD47](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mpd47/32/7383_2.png) [@MPD47](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MPD47)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2006, 10:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/4 "2006-12-22T22:37:09Z")

</div>

_cough_ Ford Taurus _cough_

Jag’s designs have never impressed me, other than the D-Type.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedGoober4Life](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redgoober4life/32/7610_2.png) [@RedGoober4Life](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RedGoober4Life)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2006, 10:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/5 "2006-12-22T22:58:30Z")

</div>

Hm. Well. Fine. The D-type was great, but to discount the E-type and Mark VII is ignorant. I can find it in my heart to forgive–car fans these days seem to discount Jaguar based on what the company had become in the late 80s and 90s.

And certainly the XK engine isn’t something to be forgotten.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MPD47](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mpd47/32/7383_2.png) [@MPD47](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MPD47)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2006, 10:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/6 "2006-12-22T22:59:55Z")

</div>

I understand why people consider the E Type to be one of the best car designs in history. But personally, I think the MKIII BJ8’s are a much prettier design.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowracer101](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@snowracer101](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/snowracer101)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2006, 10:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/7 "2006-12-23T22:24:50Z")

</div>

> [@MPD47](#):
>
> _cough_ Ford Taurus _cough_
> 
> Jag’s designs have never impressed me, other than the D-Type.

None of the current jags ride on the taurus chassie.

the type-s is a murcury maraduer/lincon LS chassie.

the x-type is based off the mondeo chassie from europe. An AWD car.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MPD47](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mpd47/32/7383_2.png) [@MPD47](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MPD47)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2006, 10:25pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/8 "2006-12-23T22:25:52Z")

</div>

I was more refering to styling. I’ve driven one, they actually hold the road fairly nicely, despite feeling like a heavy Jag when they are targeting the 911 market.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedGoober4Life](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redgoober4life/32/7610_2.png) [@RedGoober4Life](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RedGoober4Life)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2006, 10:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/9 "2006-12-23T22:54:38Z")

</div>

They are? Maybe the XKR, but certainly not the regular XK. I’m not certain people would cross shop the XK with a 911.

It’s disappointing that the XK is so heavy for being aluminum. Disappointing because that’s where the XJ shines in comparison to the other boats in the segment. They really messed up without giving it a breakthrough design and setting the stage for Jags to come (because the chassis is very fresh and had a very good and new idea to show off). I really think more people would consider it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zer0DazE](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/zer0daze/32/7624_2.png) [@Zer0DazE](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zer0DazE)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2006, 5:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/10 "2006-12-24T05:55:11Z")

</div>

thats not a jag. jags are supposed to look like a bland full sized ford sedan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OfficerK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/4da419/32.png) [@OfficerK](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OfficerK)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2006, 5:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jaguar-c-xf-concept-precursor-to-s-type-replacement/22038/11 "2006-12-24T05:58:04Z")

</div>

I heart the xkr…mmm If I could afford one I would take it, sooooo secksy

jag seems to be doing right, tough market though
