# jeep guys

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jeep-guys/204050>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [October 29, 2009, 5:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jeep-guys/204050 "2009-10-29T17:01:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 28

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmonjeepsrt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e0b2c6/32.png) [@rmonjeepsrt](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rmonjeepsrt)\
**Post date:** [November 27, 2009, 9:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jeep-guys/204050/28 "2009-11-27T21:03:42Z")

</div>

> [@On another topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/41646/38):
>
> Hey Rich what did you end up putting down?

Pat  
Final numbers were 356awd/hp and 369awd/ft lbs. This was an increase of 33hp and 40ft lbs over stock tune numbers with mods being AFE-CAI, 180 tstat, PCV bypass, and Magnaflow muffler on stock exhaust. Best part is car has better drivability and better mpg to boot. Thanks again to ED Hutchings at Virginia Speed.

> [@If You Thought The Transporter 2 Was Bad...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/if-you-thought-the-transporter-2-was-bad/41686/5):
>
> That’s an ugly truck. Sorry.
> 
> Hey Rich or Jason, can one of you email me the graph preferably in .pdf form? [edcmat-l1@msn.com](mailto:edcmat-l1@msn.com) is my email addy. Thanx!

Ed

I’m out of town till Tuesday if Jason can’t get it to you by then I still have my copy at home.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jeep-guys/204050)._
