# Jons 2004 Subaru WRX Chargespeed Super GT Widebody

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jons-2004-subaru-wrx-chargespeed-super-gt-widebody/251058>\
**Category:** Builds\
**Created:** [March 22, 2010, 9:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jons-2004-subaru-wrx-chargespeed-super-gt-widebody/251058 "2010-03-22T21:42:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 420

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![04WRX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/04wrx/32/6414_2.png) [@04WRX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/04WRX)\
**Post date:** [September 26, 2013, 7:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jons-2004-subaru-wrx-chargespeed-super-gt-widebody/251058/420 "2013-09-26T19:35:49Z")

</div>

> [@New With My GTP](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-with-my-gtp/53480/21):
>
> my 16g was pretty happy spiking 35psi pretty much all summer, turbo is still in mint shape.
> 
> pushing smaller turbos harder create a way better and more responsive in general which leads to a more fun car IMO. 440 ft/lb @ 3500rpm was pretty violent

I agree that that sounds like a blast to drive, but in my world pushing a 16g remotely close to 30 psi is absolutely unreasonable. Pull up any 16g-20g compressor map and tell me that it looks efficient at 30+ psi. I’m all about picking the right tool for the job, and anyone with a 207 will tell you that a 3076 is one of the ultimate turbos for that engine.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/jons-2004-subaru-wrx-chargespeed-super-gt-widebody/251058)._