# Just dyno'd 440WHP - 2003 Evo **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [January 7, 2009, 6:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239 "2009-01-07T18:30:11Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 4
**Author:** ![Art](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/art/32/6461_2.png) [@Art](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Art)\ **Post date:** [January 8, 2009, 9:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/61 "2009-01-08T21:05:04Z")
> [@NYSpeed Track Day](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nyspeed-track-day/9182/177): > > Ya, your tune was very good. Chad commented on it. I would have loved to have gotten it back up to Moon to compare pre and post meth #'s, then post red. My tune was VERY conservative. I could be running alot more power but we decided to just run at 28psi. Lots of guys running 30 - 35psi on stock block. Its my only car… ---
**Author:** ![Celtic1982citleC](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/celtic1982citlec/32/6323_2.png) [@Celtic1982citleC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Celtic1982citleC)\ **Post date:** [January 8, 2009, 10:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/62 "2009-01-08T22:05:27Z")
conservative is a relative term. just because a lot of guys are running 30+ psi doesn’t mean your tune is conservative at 28psi. ask granmassax about the tune he got at another shop that was supposively making good power safely. the general rule of thumb is find the motors knock threshhold, back it down enough so that if you get a bad tank of gas, overboost condition, ect, it won’t go boom, log under a lot of diff loads, call it a day. you wouldn’t want an overly conservative tune with no timing and such because it’d create such high egt’s from the burn cycle takign so long it’d cause way more wear on the motor. again, conservative is relative to the car. .02 from me ---
**Author:** ![Hooked\_on\_240](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Hooked\_on\_240](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Hooked_on_240)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2009, 12:29am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/63 "2009-01-09T00:29:33Z")
> [@Mk4 30R"](#): > > i was talking about that car in the first place. hes from jersey, goes to Siena, he was supposed to be selling the car to someone. the kids name is Brett. odd yes. it was a nasty car. built 2.0, Shearer fab manifold, AMS intake manifold, AEM EMS, 1200cc injectors, T3/T67DBB(GT37R). car should have laid down somewhere in the 600hp range. Pictures of said car, taken by me and my gf;s camra. ![http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v646/Ghost112/P1020164.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/e/4/e4f728978987ec2c55d059626bdcb3a91af8b196.jpeg) ![http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v646/Ghost112/P1020165.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/8/e/8ee509883a2db96f6d85a971321f3283bc1a14c4.jpeg) ![http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v646/Ghost112/P1020166.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/f/2/f2db1d1a217c220b5f7a17769aa68550d0ca844b.jpeg) :hijacked:—\> sorry. Nice car tho!! ---
**Author:** ![Boost\_Creep](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/boost_creep/32/6366_2.png) [@Boost\_Creep](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boost_Creep)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2009, 5:11am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/64 "2009-01-09T05:11:20Z")
> [@FS: Pioneer In-Dash DVD player and master unit](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-pioneer-in-dash-dvd-player-and-master-unit/12311/6): > > conservative is a relative term. just because a lot of guys are running 30+ psi doesn’t mean your tune is conservative at 28psi. ask granmassax about the tune he got at another shop that was supposively making good power safely. the general rule of thumb is find the motors knock threshhold, back it down enough so that if you get a bad tank of gas, overboost condition, ect, it won’t go boom, log under a lot of diff loads, call it a day. you wouldn’t want an overly conservative tune with no timing and such because it’d create such high egt’s from the burn cycle takign so long it’d cause way more wear on the motor. again, conservative is relative to the car. .02 from me I agree +1 ---
**Author:** ![GranMassaX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/granmassax/32/6299_2.png) [@GranMassaX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GranMassaX)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2009, 5:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/65 "2009-01-09T05:21:52Z")
F turbotrix, F them in the ass! ---
**Author:** ![deadbeatrec](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/deadbeatrec/32/6401_2.png) [@deadbeatrec](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/deadbeatrec)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2009, 9:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/66 "2009-01-09T09:01:38Z")
> [@WNYF-Body BBQ Cruise Video](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wnyf-body-bbq-cruise-video/12323/45): > > F turbotrix, F them in the ass! haha i hear this a lot. also my car made 504whp on a dynojet 424 on pump, meth and 28psi. ---
**Author:** ![Art](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/art/32/6461_2.png) [@Art](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Art)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2009, 6:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/67 "2009-01-09T18:28:57Z")
> [@TW: Pioneer In-Dash Multimedia A/V Receiver](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tw-pioneer-in-dash-multimedia-a-v-receiver/12319/24): > > Pictures of said car, taken by me and my gf;s camra. > > ![http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v646/Ghost112/P1020164.jpg](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/speedlife/original/3X/e/4/e4f728978987ec2c55d059626bdcb3a91af8b196.jpeg) > > :hijacked:—\> sorry. > > Nice car tho!! Wow thats a tight engine bay… Coil on plugs, sheetmetal intake, small battery, small radiator to fit the turbo setup… lots of money into that one. I’ll post a pic of mine this weekend. Doesnt look nearly as nice as that - in fact mine looks near stock. Stock looking exhaust manifold, stock looking turbo, stock battery, stock intake manifold…etc. ---
**Author:** ![Art](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/art/32/6461_2.png) [@Art](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Art)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2009, 6:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/68 "2009-01-09T18:30:03Z")
> [@FEMA has a new Toy](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fema-has-a-new-toy/12375/2): > > haha i hear this a lot. > > also my car made 504whp on a dynojet 424 on pump, meth and 28psi. What made you get rid of the Evo and what are you driving now? ---
**Author:** ![Shawn96VR-4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eada6e/32.png) [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2009, 8:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/69 "2009-01-09T20:04:34Z")
> [@PPC GPS Maps](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ppc-gps-maps/11598/21): > > Thanks for saying my Mustang dyno #'s arent accurate even though they beat your dynojet numbers… ya damn loser… What a cock block. Whoa. Calm down princess. First of all, I gave the car props so I am not sure why you got your panties in a bunch. Friggin prissy Evo owners. Second of all, Mustang dynos are NOTORIOUSLY unaccurate as they are low. They do not reflect the actual traps. That’s not a dig at your car but just the dyno in general. My point was that you go to a dyno for 2 reasons: Get #s, tune your car. I recommended going to a dyno that is REPEATABLE and ACCURATE in regards that the #s you get represents what traps you would get (Again, typically that isn’t a Mustang dyno). If it’s not accurate (ie reads high/low), it doesn’t matter if it’s repeated so you can make changes to hardware/tune and see the difference. P.S. I can’t dyno 440WHP unless I change WG springs. 🙂 P.S.S The DJ I went on was dead on was not the over inflated DJ #s that the masses seem to expect. But, who cares? ---
**Author:** ![Shawn96VR-4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eada6e/32.png) [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2009, 8:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/70 "2009-01-09T20:06:01Z")
> [@FS: Pioneer In-Dash DVD player and master unit](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-pioneer-in-dash-dvd-player-and-master-unit/12311/6): > > conservative is a relative term. just because a lot of guys are running 30+ psi doesn’t mean your tune is conservative at 28psi. ask granmassax about the tune he got at another shop that was supposively making good power safely. the general rule of thumb is find the motors knock threshhold, back it down enough so that if you get a bad tank of gas, overboost condition, ect, it won’t go boom, log under a lot of diff loads, call it a day. you wouldn’t want an overly conservative tune with no timing and such because it’d create such high egt’s from the burn cycle takign so long it’d cause way more wear on the motor. again, conservative is relative to the car. .02 from me Ugh. I heard the story on that. But, this is typically exactly what I do when I tune my car and most of the advice I got from tuners on my platform. The AFR is typically in the LOW 11s but I have the timing/boost backed off from what was on the dyno as a running car \> previously powerful running car. ---
**Author:** ![Art](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/art/32/6461_2.png) [@Art](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Art)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2009, 5:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/71 "2009-01-10T17:18:18Z")
> [@July 7,8,9 NYSpeed Showcase @ Grand Prix of Toronto](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/july-7-8-9-nyspeed-showcase-grand-prix-of-toronto/11903/63): > > Whoa. Calm down princess. > > First of all, I gave the car props so I am not sure why you got your panties in a bunch. Friggin prissy Evo owners. > > Second of all, Mustang dynos are NOTORIOUSLY unaccurate as they are low. They do not reflect the actual traps. That’s not a dig at your car but just the dyno in general. My point was that you go to a dyno for 2 reasons: Get #s, tune your car. I recommended going to a dyno that is REPEATABLE and ACCURATE in regards that the #s you get represents what traps you would get (Again, typically that isn’t a Mustang dyno). If it’s not accurate (ie reads high/low), it doesn’t matter if it’s repeated so you can make changes to hardware/tune and see the difference. > > P.S. I can’t dyno 440WHP unless I change WG springs. 🙂 > P.S.S The DJ I went on was dead on was not the over inflated DJ #s that the masses seem to expect. But, who cares? Sorry for the hate last post, had some buddies over and we had a few… Maybe I took it wrong, went overboard and played a little rough. Its just that I’ve always heard the opposite of what you are telling me - I’ve heard Mustangs are more consistant/accurate among themselves and Dynojets almost always produce over-inflated numbers. I guess since you know nothing about the CBRD Mustang dyno and I know nothing of your dynojet… we cant critisize each other on who has a more accurate dyno? Evo’s with my WHP on this dyno typically do 125 - 130MPH 1/4. I think I met you about 6 or 7 years ago at the lot… I had a black 1.8T Jetta and you had a Green VR-4 that had just run 11’s? - Princess ---
**Author:** ![Shawn96VR-4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eada6e/32.png) [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2009, 7:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/72 "2009-01-10T19:58:56Z")
> [@Solo Car Cruise, Photo Shoot, and Pics of Members Houses! \*56K Stay Inside\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solo-car-cruise-photo-shoot-and-pics-of-members-houses-56k-stay-inside/12406/7): > > Sorry for the hate last post, had some buddies over and we had a few… Maybe I took it wrong, went overboard and played a little rough. Your buddies are fags. 🙂 > [@Solo Car Cruise, Photo Shoot, and Pics of Members Houses! \*56K Stay Inside\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solo-car-cruise-photo-shoot-and-pics-of-members-houses-56k-stay-inside/12406/7): > > Its just that I’ve always heard the opposite of what you are telling me - I’ve heard Mustangs are more consistant/accurate among themselves and Dynojets almost always produce over-inflated numbers. The industry standard IS DJ. But, that doesn’t mean it is accurate. Mustang dynos are notoriously low so how is that accurate? The fact that they are LOW mean they are inaccurate. It’s really hard to correlate trap speed with HP due to all the variables (not to mention peak HP is not the same as power curve). But, like I said, that’s not a bad thing. It’s hard to get a repeatable, accurate dyno. At the very least, you want repeatable because you want to see how the #s diff based on changes. I got lucky and got both accuracy/repeatable which, coincidentally, was a DJ. But, people DO assume HIGH with DJ. But, DJ is just the dyno but not the SOFTWARE/SETUP within the DJ. It really does diff from dyno to dyno but stereotypes exist for a reason. I just pointed out that not all DJs read high. > [@Solo Car Cruise, Photo Shoot, and Pics of Members Houses! \*56K Stay Inside\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solo-car-cruise-photo-shoot-and-pics-of-members-houses-56k-stay-inside/12406/7): > > I guess since you know nothing about the CBRD Mustang dyno and I know nothing of your dynojet… we cant critisize each other on who has a more accurate dyno? Evo’s with my WHP on this dyno typically do 125 - 130MPH 1/4. I don’t know anything about that dyno but 440AWHP in an EVO and 125-130MPH do not match, at all. Unless you took off the frame? 🙂 > [@Solo Car Cruise, Photo Shoot, and Pics of Members Houses! \*56K Stay Inside\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solo-car-cruise-photo-shoot-and-pics-of-members-houses-56k-stay-inside/12406/7): > > I think I met you about 6 or 7 years ago at the lot… I had a black 1.8T Jetta and you had a Green VR-4 that had just run 11’s? It could be. I didn’t go to the lot much. > [@Solo Car Cruise, Photo Shoot, and Pics of Members Houses! \*56K Stay Inside\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solo-car-cruise-photo-shoot-and-pics-of-members-houses-56k-stay-inside/12406/7): > > - Princess LOL. Nicely played. ---
**Author:** ![EJEvo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ejevo/32/6361_2.png) [@EJEvo](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/EJEvo)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2009, 8:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/73 "2009-01-10T20:46:51Z")
> [@July 7,8,9 NYSpeed Showcase @ Grand Prix of Toronto](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/july-7-8-9-nyspeed-showcase-grand-prix-of-toronto/11903/63): > > Friggin prissy Evo owners. That’s an “unaccurate” portrait of us Evo owners. 😃 Art - very impressive numbers. Sounds like a handful. ---
**Author:** ![Art](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/art/32/6461_2.png) [@Art](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Art)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2009, 8:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/74 "2009-01-10T20:59:54Z")
> [@Official: Roller Hockey Wednesday Nights - Pepsi Center](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-roller-hockey-wednesday-nights-pepsi-center/10887/54): > > Your buddies are fags. 🙂 Moderators are fags 🙂 > [@Official: Roller Hockey Wednesday Nights - Pepsi Center](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-roller-hockey-wednesday-nights-pepsi-center/10887/54): > > The industry standard IS DJ. But, that doesn’t mean it is accurate. Mustang dynos are notoriously low so how is that accurate? The fact that they are LOW mean they are inaccurate. It’s really hard to correlate trap speed with HP due to all the variables (not to mention peak HP is not the same as power curve). But, like I said, that’s not a bad thing. It’s hard to get a repeatable, accurate dyno. At the very least, you want repeatable because you want to see how the #s diff based on changes. I got lucky and got both accuracy/repeatable which, coincidentally, was a DJ. But, people DO assume HIGH with DJ. But, DJ is just the dyno but not the SOFTWARE/SETUP within the DJ. It really does diff from dyno to dyno but stereotypes exist for a reason. I just pointed out that not all DJs read high. Just because a mustang dyno reads low does not mean it is innacurate. They measure on a different scale than a dynojet just like Celcius vs Fahrenhieght and MPH vs KPH. The CBRD dyno reads low and is consistant/accurate/repeatable/whatever you want to call it. A brand new M5 (rated 500HP from factory) dyno’d at 367WHP on this dyno. > [@Official: Roller Hockey Wednesday Nights - Pepsi Center](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-roller-hockey-wednesday-nights-pepsi-center/10887/54): > > I don’t know anything about that dyno but 440AWHP in an EVO and 125-130MPH do not match, at all. Unless you took off the frame? 🙂 I wont argue with you further since you have already won the internet many times over. But plenty of Evo’s with same or less mods, same or less boost, same or lower octane gas are in the mid 120’s. Evo’s dont weigh 4000lbs. Here’s what some guys with similiar mods/FP Red run. Note the first few guys in the 9’s@140MPH have built motors and I’m quite obviously nowhere close to them. > **[Top 15 Fastest/Quickest Stock Appearing Turbos for 2008... - EvolutionM -...](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/drag-racing/367128-top-15-fastest-quickest-stock-appearing-turbos-2008-a.html)** > > Drag Racing - Top 15 Fastest/Quickest Stock Appearing Turbos for 2008... - Top 20 Fastest/Quickest Stock Appearing Turbos for 2008... The last couple years we have had a fastest overall turbo list and a fastest stock turbo list. Now that stock... > [@Official: Roller Hockey Wednesday Nights - Pepsi Center](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-roller-hockey-wednesday-nights-pepsi-center/10887/54): > > It could be. I didn’t go to the lot much. I think that was the last time I was there… 6 or 7 years ago. Maybe you left a bad taste in my mouth? :blbl: No matter your response, you win the internet. Again. -Princess ---
**Author:** ![Shawn96VR-4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eada6e/32.png) [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2009, 9:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/75 "2009-01-10T21:13:01Z")
> [@Plastic Epoxy???](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/plastic-epoxy/12236/27): > > Moderators are fags 🙂 Friggin Beanie! > [@Plastic Epoxy???](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/plastic-epoxy/12236/27): > > Just because a mustang dyno reads low does not mean it is innacurate. They measure on a different scale than a dynojet just like Celcius vs Fahrenhieght and MPH vs KPH. The CBRD dyno reads low and is consistant/accurate/repeatable/whatever you want to call it. A brand new M5 (rated 500HP from factory) dyno’d at 367WHP on this dyno. Spin it anyway you want. The fact that it reads low (which you admitted above) is the very definition of “inaccurate”. > [@Plastic Epoxy???](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/plastic-epoxy/12236/27): > > I wont argue with you further since you have already won the internet many times over. But plenty of Evo’s with same or less mods, same or less boost, same or lower octane gas are in the mid 120’s. Evo’s dont weigh 4000lbs. I am not arguing nor trying to win anything. I don’t think you have a clue what I am talking about. Again, 125-130 and 440AWHP seems very off. It’s probably your low read dyno (ie you are really making more power). Just more proof that the #s are inaccurate. I am not sure how much simplier I can make this point. Also, you are taking it personal, again, when it’s not meant to be insulting. > [@Plastic Epoxy???](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/plastic-epoxy/12236/27): > > Here’s what some guys with similiar mods/FP Red run. Note the first few guys in the 9’s@140MPH have built motors and I’m quite obviously nowhere close to them. > > [Top 15 Fastest/Quickest Stock Appearing Turbos for 2008... - EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community](http://forums.evolutionm.net/drag-racing/367128-top-15-fastest-quickest-stock-appearing-turbos-2008-a.html) That’s fantastic. ---
**Author:** ![kramerbuccs24](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kramerbuccs24/32/6397_2.png) [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2009, 9:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/76 "2009-01-10T21:55:33Z")
cute conversations in here :mamoru: 😃 ---
**Author:** ![Art](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/art/32/6461_2.png) [@Art](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Art)\ **Post date:** [January 11, 2009, 11:08am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/77 "2009-01-11T11:08:06Z")
> [@So What Do We Think of These Seats?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/so-what-do-we-think-of-these-seats/12398/35): > > cute conversations in here :mamoru: 😃 Us Mitsubishi guys are very emotional and prissy. Dont mess with us :ohnoes:gay:mamoru: ---
**Author:** ![Art](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/art/32/6461_2.png) [@Art](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Art)\ **Post date:** [January 11, 2009, 12:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/78 "2009-01-11T12:49:38Z")
So here are some pics of the engine bay after todays snowstorm. Lots of salt on the engine. Pretty stock looking. Mind you, I dont mod the car for looks… :retardclap Absolutely nothing special. Actualy quite depressing. ![http://shift518.gom-host.com//attachment.php?attachmentid=67&d=1231706597](http://shift518.gom-host.com//attachment.php?attachmentid=67&d=1231706597) ![http://shift518.gom-host.com//attachment.php?attachmentid=68&d=1231706609](http://shift518.gom-host.com//attachment.php?attachmentid=68&d=1231706609) ![http://shift518.gom-host.com//attachment.php?attachmentid=69&d=1231706620](http://shift518.gom-host.com//attachment.php?attachmentid=69&d=1231706620) ---
**Author:** ![psi2high](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/psi2high/32/6320_2.png) [@psi2high](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/psi2high)\ **Post date:** [January 11, 2009, 1:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/79 "2009-01-11T13:56:22Z")
Buschur racing has a mustang dyno and their daily driven evo 8 with 618awhp went 9.60’s on pump gas. Im pretty sure a 440awhp should crack mid 120’s ---
**Author:** ![kramerbuccs24](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kramerbuccs24/32/6397_2.png) [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)\ **Post date:** [January 11, 2009, 2:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/80 "2009-01-11T14:01:09Z")
> [@sober people... got a q](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sober-people-got-a-q/12414/50): > > So here are some pics of the engine bay after todays snowstorm. Lots of salt on the engine. Pretty stock looking. Mind you, I dont mod the car for looks… :retardclap > > Absolutely nothing special. Actualy quite depressing. If you’re going to attach a picture, you can’t take that link and then put it in the " [img] [/img] " brackets, it’s one or the other 😃 just take the original URL link from the pics and put it in the IMG brackets, or if they’re off your desktop, upload them to photobucket and copy & paste the IMG brackets into here. [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239.md?page=3) [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239.md?page=5)