# Just dyno'd 440WHP - 2003 Evo

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [January 7, 2009, 6:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239 "2009-01-07T18:30:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mk4_30r_ban/32/6347_2.png) [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2009, 7:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/121 "2009-01-12T19:19:20Z")

</div>

mustangsally, what did you run on MD? i mean 277whp is ALOT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bennyfizzle](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bennyfizzle/32/6291_2.png) [@bennyfizzle](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bennyfizzle)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2009, 7:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/122 "2009-01-12T19:59:12Z")

</div>

that’s like 400 whp on a dynojet, I should know, I put down 240 on a mustang and my car’s easily 450+whp.

Shits nuts dude

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psi2high](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/psi2high/32/6320_2.png) [@psi2high](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/psi2high)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2009, 8:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/123 "2009-01-12T20:04:14Z")

</div>

You suck

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mk4_30r_ban/32/6347_2.png) [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2009, 8:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/124 "2009-01-12T20:04:56Z")

</div>

im aiming for 180whp and a 15.0 this year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deadbeatrec](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/deadbeatrec/32/6401_2.png) [@deadbeatrec](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/deadbeatrec)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2009, 8:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/125 "2009-01-13T08:51:52Z")

</div>

> [@5/24/06 shredd and raegans](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/5-24-06-shredd-and-raegans/12452/7):
>
> Ets!!!

i have seen some ETS kits dyno about 50-70whp less than they should. these werent there twin scroll kits or any of the HTA’s but still. also there intercoolers arnt as good as the Buschur unit.

i have done my time (4 years) in the evoh world and buschur and AMS are #1. i would say buschur parts are less engineered but work just as well if not better in some cases.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_Jesse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e9bcb4/32.png) [@imported\_Jesse](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_Jesse)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2009, 7:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/126 "2009-01-13T19:08:34Z")

</div>

> [@Why your views are wrong.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-your-views-are-wrong/12447/171):
>
> i have seen some ETS kits dyno about 50-70whp less than they should. these werent there twin scroll kits or any of the HTA’s but still. also there intercoolers arnt as good as the Buschur unit.
> 
> i have done my time (4 years) in the evoh world and buschur and AMS are #1. i would say buschur parts are less engineered but work just as well if not better in some cases.

There is nothing in an ets kit that would make it dyno any less (especially that much) than any other similar kit…thats just bs if you believe that.

I’ve tested so many manifolds is not even funny…Pick your kit based on quality/customer service/price…powerwise, apples to apples with the same size turbo/dp/exhaust/cams, etc there won’t be much of a difference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deadbeatrec](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/deadbeatrec/32/6401_2.png) [@deadbeatrec](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/deadbeatrec)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2009, 7:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/127 "2009-01-14T07:48:00Z")

</div>

> [@turbo civic \> turbo Z28 drop top](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/turbo-civic-turbo-z28-drop-top/12511/29):
>
> There is nothing in an ets kit that would make it dyno any less (especially that much) than any other similar kit…thats just bs if you believe that.
> 
> I’ve tested so many manifolds is not even funny…Pick your kit based on quality/customer service/price…powerwise, apples to apples with the same size turbo/dp/exhaust/cams, etc there won’t be much of a difference.

ETS’s lower line kits dont use the same exhaust manifolds as there higher kits do. and im not making anything up, i was there watching these kits be dynoed at ICS over the summer. my car with the ATP kit and the full race mani was romping all over these ETS equiped cars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Art](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/art/32/6461_2.png) [@Art](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Art)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2009, 7:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/128 "2009-01-14T19:33:56Z")

</div>

For whatever the comparison is worth… one guy did 480WHP on my same Mustang dyno then did 550WHP on a dynojet all with same mods. Do the math yourself, for what its worth…

…linky: [http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-dyno-tuning-results/382461-my-dynojet-vs-mustang-comparison-not-test.html](http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-dyno-tuning-results/382461-my-dynojet-vs-mustang-comparison-not-test.html)

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239.md?page=6)
