# Just dyno'd 440WHP - 2003 Evo

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [January 7, 2009, 6:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239 "2009-01-07T18:30:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 126

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_Jesse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e9bcb4/32.png) [@imported\_Jesse](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_Jesse)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2009, 7:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239/126 "2009-01-13T19:08:34Z")

</div>

> [@Why your views are wrong.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-your-views-are-wrong/12447/171):
>
> i have seen some ETS kits dyno about 50-70whp less than they should. these werent there twin scroll kits or any of the HTA’s but still. also there intercoolers arnt as good as the Buschur unit.
> 
> i have done my time (4 years) in the evoh world and buschur and AMS are #1. i would say buschur parts are less engineered but work just as well if not better in some cases.

There is nothing in an ets kit that would make it dyno any less (especially that much) than any other similar kit…thats just bs if you believe that.

I’ve tested so many manifolds is not even funny…Pick your kit based on quality/customer service/price…powerwise, apples to apples with the same size turbo/dp/exhaust/cams, etc there won’t be much of a difference.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/just-dynod-440whp-2003-evo/241239)._