# K20 vs Supra

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/k20-vs-supra/23146
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [January 16, 2007, 4:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/k20-vs-supra/23146 "2007-01-16T16:06:16Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![redrum](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redrum/32/7398_2.png) [@redrum](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/redrum)
#### Post date: [January 16, 2007, 8:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/k20-vs-supra/23146/22 "2007-01-16T20:46:01Z")

</div>

> [@brent\_strong](#):
>
> Comments tell all. 203whp, 13.01 @ 101mph. The car isn’t slow, but it certainly isn’t fast. It beating a legit 400whp Supra doesn’t add up that well, but at 1800lbs (not sure if that’s even close to realistic) and with great gearing, it may be possible.
> 
> 200whp for a K is like barely worked at all, right? K-pro, intake/header/exhaust?

depends on the dyno, altitude, weather, etc, but a stock k20a with a shit header should put down around or above 200whp.

that hatch was pretty gutted, but he had a passenger the whole time.

13.01 @ 101 = slicks

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/k20-vs-supra/23146)._