# Kid suspended for answer fathers phone call during class **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [April 13, 2008, 12:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/kid-suspended-for-answer-fathers-phone-call-during-class/196799 "2008-04-13T12:15:20Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 31
**Author:** ![beat90tsi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/43a26b/32.png) [@beat90tsi](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/beat90tsi)\ **Post date:** [April 14, 2008, 9:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/kid-suspended-for-answer-fathers-phone-call-during-class/196799/31 "2008-04-14T09:44:15Z")
> [@Knocked Up ON DVD TODAY!!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/knocked-up-on-dvd-today/35935/3): > > i didn’t have a cell phone in school growing up. i did fine without it. the biggest problem is if that kid was allowed to use his phone in class because his dad served then would have to allow everyone else to answer their phone too. rules are rules. granted it was shitty that kid had to be suspended but it just shows that everyone is equal. i think there needs be a line drawn somewhere. kids are in school for education. Elimination of mandatory school attendance would help fix a lot of these problems. The douche-nozzles that don’t want to learn anything can go be degenerates right away, and go flip burgers. That will make education less expensive, and of a higher quality, because the babysitting aspect would be greatly reduced. Then if a kid wants to take a call from his dad, he can step out in the hallway, talk to his dad, and go back to class. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/kid-suspended-for-answer-fathers-phone-call-during-class/196799)._