# Kid suspended for answer fathers phone call during class

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/kid-suspended-for-answer-fathers-phone-call-during-class/196799
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [April 13, 2008, 12:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/kid-suspended-for-answer-fathers-phone-call-during-class/196799 "2008-04-13T12:15:20Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 58

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![fah\_quad](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ac91a4/32.png) [@fah\_quad](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fah_quad)
#### Post date: [April 14, 2008, 6:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/kid-suspended-for-answer-fathers-phone-call-during-class/196799/58 "2008-04-14T18:33:18Z")

</div>

> [@Sell my truck for $10k](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sell-my-truck-for-10k/35894/26):
>
> I’m sorry but thats not true. Back to 9/11 again when countless parents of woodland hills students were not allowed to even deliver a simple “I’m coming to pick my child up” message to their own kids. Sure you don’t want to cause panic during a situation like that but you also do not leave a bunch of innocent children in a likely target for more bs like that. Face it…the rules are bent on BOTH sides of the line.

9/11, Columbine, V-Tech, etc… all changed the protocol by which districts evaluate and modify the rules.  
What about a kid answering a cell phone from a co-conspirator when they both plan to blow up the building or shoot up the place?  
You can’t use any of the as examples for this incident. This happened with one kid who had nothing other than a father in Iraq.  
Cell phones should not be in schools.  
He broke the rules. The rules should’ve been enforced. The rule had too severe of a punishment.  
/thread

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/kid-suspended-for-answer-fathers-phone-call-during-class/196799)._