# Lets chat about the Ford GT **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [April 28, 2010, 8:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-chat-about-the-ford-gt/251816 "2010-04-28T08:41:51Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 118
**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\ **Post date:** [April 28, 2010, 11:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-chat-about-the-ford-gt/251816/118 "2010-04-28T11:38:23Z")
> [@I \<3 Mandi](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-3-mandi/30584/774): > > Get up close to one. The craftsmanship is 100% Ford and if it’s going to be worth $100k+, it better have the fit and finish of the other $100k+ cars. Making a low-slung monocoque and added a blown F150 motor does not a supercar make TO ME. Keywords, TO ME. The C6 Vettes are more sophisticated than FGTs and cheaper too. > > And the bottom end being capable of 1000bhp stock just means its more ham-fisted American lazy ‘engineering’. If it can take all that power, that means they could’ve designed it to make the stock 550hp (or whatever) and be significantly lighter, higher revving, etc. > > $.02. Move along, nothing to see here. Ive been up close to one, and even got to ride in one up at LG a few years back for a few minutes. The craftsmanship is not bad by any means, and the body looks just fine, no retarded gaps etc. Maybe the one you saw the rear hatch was popped lol. > [@The baby blue shark hood neon tried chasing me down...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-baby-blue-shark-hood-neon-tried-chasing-me-down/30686/829): > > based on the 230mph=1400WHP > > 266mph = 2187 WHP (+787HP) > > Just for reference. How do you come about that? --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-chat-about-the-ford-gt/251816)._