# Lets chat about the Ford GT **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Automotive\ **Created:** [April 28, 2010, 8:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-chat-about-the-ford-gt/251816 "2010-04-28T08:41:51Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 131
**Author:** ![99FRC](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/99frc/32/6335_2.png) [@99FRC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/99FRC)\ **Post date:** [April 29, 2010, 7:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-chat-about-the-ford-gt/251816/131 "2010-04-29T07:21:25Z")
> [@The baby blue shark hood neon tried chasing me down...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/the-baby-blue-shark-hood-neon-tried-chasing-me-down/30686/842): > > Ford GT is much better looking than the lambo. > > IMO Lambos have gone downhill in appearence over the years. > > Although the newer murcielagos don’t look to bad, shoulda picked one of those to make your argument and not that POS looking gallardo Unfortunately for me then I guess, I only factor about 25% of my decision on overall appearance. I value other things more importantly, like overall quality, overall performance, and cost for what you are getting. And if you have ever driven an older lambo (which I doubt you have) you would know they are shit. I drove a 99’ Diablo SV, highway and back roads, and it was the equivalent of riding in a box truck. Other than looking cool, it rattled all over the place, had warning lights on all over the place, road like shit, overall I would never spend that kind of money on one. I have also ridden in a Gallardo, granted as a passenger you don’t get the full experience it felt 100x better than the Diablo. You go spend $150k on a Ford GT and ill spend half as much on Lambo and you can sit there and complain that my car sucks because you spent $70K more than me to have a car that “looks” better. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-chat-about-the-ford-gt/251816)._