# Let's talk about Porsche baby **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [July 31, 2006, 3:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-talk-about-porsche-baby/15298 "2006-07-31T15:59:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 32
**Author:** ![rskrause](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rskrause/32/7367_2.png) [@rskrause](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rskrause)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2006, 10:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-talk-about-porsche-baby/15298/32 "2006-08-01T10:35:39Z")
> [@Xander](#): > > The 911 Turbo Vs. current Vette debate is so old. The “same” debate has been goin on for years. > > If you wanna know who the winner is, take a look at one of the older versions of this battle, let’s take the 1994 911 3.6 Turbo vs. the 1994 “ZR1” (yeah, remember they made such a thing) :lol: and see where time takes this “battle”. 😉 > > Back to the Topic of this thread, I think the Ideas are great for this turbo, also the “overboost” option that is availble, but yeah I don’t think you get what you paid for. The GT3 is a better track car, and they could have just used larger turbos for more power. I’m sure it gives a better power band, but when it comes to being “fast” the bigger turbo with the right gears will be best. > > X… Apples and oranges, the Porsche Turbo is and has always been much more expensive than the 'vette. The fact that people DO compare them shows how good the 'vette is for the $$$. But I guess that the Porsche Turbo and the 'vette appeal to different people in the first place, so the comparison is more bench racing than anything else. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lets-talk-about-porsche-baby/15298)._