# Looking at ZX6Rs

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/looking-at-zx6rs/189025>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [April 4, 2007, 9:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/looking-at-zx6rs/189025 "2007-04-04T09:49:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sight\_N\_Sound](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/sight_n_sound/32/5950_2.png) [@Sight\_N\_Sound](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Sight_N_Sound)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2007, 5:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/looking-at-zx6rs/189025/3 "2007-04-04T17:41:36Z")

</div>

> [@Huge Fire Over Buffalo?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/huge-fire-over-buffalo/29245/13):
>
> 03-04 are the best years, thats when they went to 636 cc’s ~135 hp~, the newer ones are nice as well, but i hear there are problems seeing the guages unless laying flat (not most of the riding)
> 
> I’ve got an '04 but it needs painted and has plastics damage around the turn signals from being dropped (not while moving)
> 
> I realize this is not what ur looking for but my opinion holds true of the years for zx6rs. Def do not get a carbed bike 01 + 02 may be carbed, not sure.

X2, I think in 04 636 was the top bike on the ciurcit.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/looking-at-zx6rs/189025)._