# ls1 build...well kind of

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ls1-build-well-kind-of/34941>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [September 6, 2007, 12:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ls1-build-well-kind-of/34941 "2007-09-06T12:27:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 44

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psychopjv](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/psychopjv/32/7251_2.png) [@psychopjv](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/psychopjv)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2007, 9:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ls1-build-well-kind-of/34941/44 "2007-09-09T09:04:53Z")

</div>

[quote=“joelster,post:41,topic:34941"”]

jeeves laid down 392 on an addmitedly highish dyno if memory serves me correctly. Yes it sounds good. Once you get ANY cam over 220 @.050 it will sound good. It just sucks to know he left a lot on the table, and he’s got an LS6 not an LS1 for crying out loud! I’m sure his car could handle a big cam better than an LS1. I honestly can’t remember the last time I heard someone put in a mildish cam, and not complain that they should have gone bigger a month or two later.

P.S. I don’t have the 847, I have a comp “cookie cutter cam”

[/quote]

i’m not complaining about my cam? i’ve had zero issues with this cam aside from the fact that it makes the motor noisy. I actually thought about going to a smaller cam with different lobe characteristics just to shut it up some. LS6/LS1 the difference isn’t anything to massive contrary to popular belief.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ls1-build-well-kind-of/34941)._