# LT1 headers?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lt1-headers/185061>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [September 18, 2006, 8:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lt1-headers/185061 "2006-09-18T20:24:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whats\_Missing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/a183cd/32.png) [@Whats\_Missing](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Whats_Missing)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2006, 6:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lt1-headers/185061/4 "2006-09-19T06:01:54Z")

</div>

> [@Neon in SCCA ITA](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/neon-in-scca-ita/24309/18):
>
> The general consensus is going to be long tubes. However, there are a lot of guys running 350s with mid lengths at power levels above (sometimes well above) 400 flywheel. I have Jet Hot coated MACs and was happy with them (close to the AS&M mids but with better plug access)). I’ve heard the low end/top end debate and have seen a lot of examples that support arguments either way. Now that I have a 383 I’m considering going long tube.
> 
> And I would go with the 3" cat back over the 2.5".
> 
> Most header manufacturers will have a y pipe that will mate up to your cat back system.

Jeff, if you decide to sell the MAC’s let me know.

Slow, if you are going to lower your car (or already have), avoid long tubes as they will just scrape, and may get flat-spotted.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lt1-headers/185061)._