# Material for splitter

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/material-for-splitter/251908>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [May 3, 2010, 6:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/material-for-splitter/251908 "2010-05-03T18:30:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fn\_Skanks](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fn_skanks/32/6308_2.png) [@Fn\_Skanks](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Fn_Skanks)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2010, 6:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/material-for-splitter/251908/11 "2010-05-06T18:13:57Z")

</div>

> [@HHOF (not hasslehoff)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/hhof-not-hasslehoff/31637/16):
>
> Alumalite is much lighter than the other choices you named. And you dont want it to flex in the slightest if you also want it to work.

Normally if the under tray were integrated with the splitter (one piece) that would be obvious. However, in my application I have a f.g. lip which is separate from my laminate coated under tray. My car is low and sees street use so I need the underside to give a little.

I can assure you that an alumalite copy of my under panel is actually very close in weight to what I’ve constructed. I’m talking much less than 1/2" thick.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/material-for-splitter/251908)._
