# Maybe time for a little censorship?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/maybe-time-for-a-little-censorship/14870>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [July 21, 2006, 11:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/maybe-time-for-a-little-censorship/14870 "2006-07-21T11:21:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 56

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2006, 2:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/maybe-time-for-a-little-censorship/14870/56 "2006-07-21T14:29:01Z")

</div>

> [@AfXtc777](#):
>
> This IS NOT child porn it is depicting an actual gruesome act that is 100% real and does happen. I am sure they aren’t going to be showing dakota bent over fucked by some 40 yr old.

Honestly… I agree… but…

> However, reports are now saying Dakota’s role in the film calls for her to be – wait for it – “raped in one explicit scene and to appear naked or clad only in ‘underpants’ in several other horrifying moments.” Yeah, I’ll let you sit with that one for a second.

exposing a 12 little kid to that ish is wrong IMO… sure, if it was part of the plot (aka not actually showing her naked/getting raped), yeah… whatever… but the above quote is fucked up and if the parents willingly expose their child to that, they really shouldnt be parents (their probably running low on cash they took from their daughters previous films)

I’d probably pop the fucker in the jaw that ever proposed anything like that to a child of mine…

no wait… I’m the fucked up one :roll:

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/maybe-time-for-a-little-censorship/14870)._
