# MclarenF1GP TURBOOOo vs Hooked on 240000

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214>\
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\
**Created:** [November 16, 2008, 6:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214 "2008-11-16T06:50:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GATVILLE](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/gatville/32/6362_2.png) [@GATVILLE](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GATVILLE)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2008, 7:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/61 "2008-11-17T19:55:36Z")

</div>

> [@ninety1two40](#):
>
> What Mclaren should do is swap out the POS 3.1 for a 3.3 and turbo that. The 3.3 is no joke, buick FTW!

3.3 ftw, just bolt on the 3800 supercharger along with fuel rail/injectors and have the ecu reprogrammed. :nod

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GATVILLE](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/gatville/32/6362_2.png) [@GATVILLE](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GATVILLE)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2008, 7:55pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/62 "2008-11-17T19:55:55Z")

</div>

> [@ninety1two40](#):
>
> Ah yeah your right, 87 was the last year for the g-body. Where’s lacville to chime in, he’s the new g-body king on here anyway.
> 
> I’ll hit you up after thanksgiving.

g-bodys ran 78-87 and some in 88 with left over parts, ie cutlass supreme classic and some mc/ss. ect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Singh1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ba8739/32.png) [@Singh1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Singh1)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2008, 8:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/63 "2008-11-17T20:29:24Z")

</div>

> [@Hooked on 240](#):
>
> ya he was going 55 then slammed on the brakes.
> 
> still drove the car tho. only real damage was to the front bumper support/headlights. thats it. the next week the rods went as i filled up the tank all the way at hess in rotterdam. motor blew the fuck up infront of wendys.

ahaha my motor blew with 3/4 tank of gas

i was PISSED

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![K20power](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/41988e/32.png) [@K20power](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/K20power)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2008, 8:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/64 "2008-11-17T20:30:32Z")

</div>

> [@Singh](#):
>
> ahaha my motor blew with 3/4 tank of gas
> 
> i was PISSED

ORLY…cuz you can just pump it out like I did with the full fucking tank my civic had when it came off the road :headbang

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hooked\_on\_240](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Hooked\_on\_240](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Hooked_on_240)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 5:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/65 "2008-11-18T05:38:38Z")

</div>

> [@K20powerz](#):
>
> ORLY…cuz you can just pump it out like I did with the full fucking tank my civic had when it came off the road :headbang

iirc my grand prix had a theft thingy, so you couldnt stick anything in the tank ie… hose. My neon had it too. both cars i had almost full tank. :headbang

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninety1two40](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ninety1two40/32/6332_2.png) [@ninety1two40](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ninety1two40)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 7:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/66 "2008-11-18T07:40:14Z")

</div>

> [@Hooked on 240](#):
>
> iirc my grand prix had a theft thingy, so you couldnt stick anything in the tank ie… hose. My neon had it too. both cars i had almost full tank. :headbang

You could wire the fuel pump to 12V directly and just detach the hose at the fuel rail and pump away! That’s what I do!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MX-5](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mx-5/32/6336_2.png) [@MX-5](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MX-5)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 7:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/67 "2008-11-18T07:44:56Z")

</div>

> [@ninety1two40](#):
>
> You could wire the fuel pump to 12V directly and just detach the hose at the fuel rail and pump away! That’s what I do!

I’ve heard running it like that can burn out the pump

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shady](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6de8d8/32.png) [@Shady](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shady)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 7:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/68 "2008-11-18T07:50:46Z")

</div>

> [@IROC](#):
>
> I’ve heard running it like that can burn out the pump

If its out of gas yes. I remember reading something about how fuel pumps are more prone to fail for those people who run their gastanks dry before filling up. Cause the gas helps cool the pump and when your shits on E the pump is exposed and not getting as much cooling.

I don’t know how valid it is, but it sorta makes sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninety1two40](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ninety1two40/32/6332_2.png) [@ninety1two40](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ninety1two40)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 8:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/69 "2008-11-18T08:10:08Z")

</div>

> [@Shady](#):
>
> If its out of gas yes. I remember reading something about how fuel pumps are more prone to fail for those people who run their gastanks dry before filling up. Cause the gas helps cool the pump and when your shits on E the pump is exposed and not getting as much cooling.
> 
> I don’t know how valid it is, but it sorta makes sense.

Exactly. Just don’t run the pump dry.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johawk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/johawk/32/6284_2.png) [@Johawk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Johawk)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 8:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/70 "2008-11-18T08:24:04Z")

</div>

> [@LACVILLE](#):
>
> 3.3 ftw, just bolt on the 3800 supercharger along with fuel rail/injectors and have the ecu reprogrammed. :nod

You would need the series I top end. Heads, intake, and inferior m-62. and the 3.3L is a tall deck block that wont fit under the hood of the FWD W-bodies and would require intake spacers. A Series II 3.8L is far superior in head flow, reciprocating geometry, and Gen 3 M-90 blower.

> [@IROC](#):
>
> I’ve heard running it like that can burn out the pump

If you only do it a few times its ok its the people who run to E and then only put a 1/4 tank in until you’re at E again that will burn out pumps. We all did it in HS. lol

Fuel cools and lubricates the pump so if its dry excessive wear will occur.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plaf713](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/439d5e/32.png) [@plaf713](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/plaf713)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 8:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/71 "2008-11-18T08:31:56Z")

</div>

some do and some dont, like my car and slohawks the pump is always cooled due to it being always submerged up until there is no fuel at all, well atleast the 99-02 tanks were like that

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johawk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/johawk/32/6284_2.png) [@Johawk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Johawk)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 8:33am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/72 "2008-11-18T08:33:53Z")

</div>

> [@plaf713](#):
>
> some do and some dont, like my car and slohawks the pump is always cooled due to it being always submerged up until there is no fuel at all, well atleast the 99-02 tanks were like that

No… Im fucked with the steel 98-99.5ish tank. But it is much more versatile to DIY dual walbro 340s ;D

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GATVILLE](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/gatville/32/6362_2.png) [@GATVILLE](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GATVILLE)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 8:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/73 "2008-11-18T08:35:45Z")

</div>

> [@Johawk](#):
>
> You would need the series I top end. Heads, intake, and inferior m-62. and the 3.3L is a tall deck block that wont fit under the hood of the FWD W-bodies and would require intake spacers. A Series II 3.8L is far superior in head flow, reciprocating geometry, and Gen 3 M-90 blower.

i thought you didnt need to swap heads? and yes it wont fit under the hood lawlz

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johawk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/johawk/32/6284_2.png) [@Johawk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Johawk)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 8:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/74 "2008-11-18T08:40:53Z")

</div>

I know the series 2 requires a head swap because there are no injectors in the intake but in the heads on the supercharged version. I think there is a reason why they recomend a heads swap. I think the valves and valve springs are stronger. some of the older engines used 2 peice valves that can leave a valve head implanted in a piston.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plaf713](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/439d5e/32.png) [@plaf713](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/plaf713)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 8:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/75 "2008-11-18T08:46:23Z")

</div>

> [@Johawk](#):
>
> I know the series 2 requires a head swap because there are no injectors in the intake but in the heads on the supercharged version. I think there is a reason why they recomend a heads swap. I think the valves and valve springs are stronger. some of the older engines used 2 peice valves that can leave a valve head implanted in a piston.

i would think that the valve springs a rated for a blower on the gtp heads, most F/I applications require a valespring swap

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bennyfizzle](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bennyfizzle/32/6291_2.png) [@bennyfizzle](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bennyfizzle)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 8:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/76 "2008-11-18T08:53:35Z")

</div>

I am going to shoot myself in the face if this thread goes on any longer. Lock 1

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johawk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/johawk/32/6284_2.png) [@Johawk](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Johawk)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 9:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/77 "2008-11-18T09:04:54Z")

</div>

> [@BENNYFIZZLE](#):
>
> I am going to shoot myself in the face if this thread goes on any longer. Lock 1

Not if I beat you to it :lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mcflurry](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mcflurry/32/6468_2.png) [@mcflurry](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/mcflurry)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 9:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/78 "2008-11-18T09:05:10Z")

</div>

lock 2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bennyfizzle](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bennyfizzle/32/6291_2.png) [@bennyfizzle](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bennyfizzle)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 9:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/79 "2008-11-18T09:10:36Z")

</div>

> [@Johawk](#):
>
> Not if I beat you to it :lol

ummm

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninety1two40](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ninety1two40/32/6332_2.png) [@ninety1two40](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ninety1two40)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2008, 9:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214/80 "2008-11-18T09:13:21Z")

</div>

Lock -1

I just deleted one!!!

FWD GM FTW!!!1!!11!!111

:lol

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mclarenf1gp-turboooo-vs-hooked-on-240000/240214.md?page=5)
