# Me and Challenger SRT8 @ PRP 7/2

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/me-and-challenger-srt8-prp-7-2/198370>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [July 2, 2008, 9:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/me-and-challenger-srt8-prp-7-2/198370 "2008-07-02T21:46:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 40

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SixSpeed454SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e19adc/32.png) [@SixSpeed454SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SixSpeed454SS)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2008, 8:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/me-and-challenger-srt8-prp-7-2/198370/40 "2008-07-07T20:38:54Z")

</div>

> [@WTB : Subaru Suspension V. 92 Legacy](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wtb-subaru-suspension-v-92-legacy/36743/4):
>
> Just total speculation here, but I am guessing they had trouble building a driveline to handle the abuse of the 6.1 going through a manual but didn’t want to delay production any longer. My prediction is a beefier driveline for next year with the 6spd. I could be totally off, maybe they couldn’t agree on a shift knob.

Must be the shift knob…the T56 is in the Viper and SRT10 truck & it holds up just fine.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/me-and-challenger-srt8-prp-7-2/198370)._
