# More auto food for thought

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [March 11, 2012, 4:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981 "2012-03-11T16:59:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 169

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skidplate](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c2a13f/32.png) [@Skidplate](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Skidplate)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2012, 11:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981/169 "2012-03-17T11:00:04Z")

</div>

> [@FS: 95-99 Maxima parts (parts car)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-95-99-maxima-parts-parts-car/48611/2):
>
> This will be fun. Please, continue with Motor Trend as your source and using THEIR opinions as YOUR argument.
> 
> Here’s some legitimate facts.
> 
> 2011 BMW M5 lap time - 7:55.00… Same as a Ferrari F430, faster than a stock 996 911 Turbo
> 
> 2009 Cadillac CTS-V - 7:59.32
> 
> SOURCE: [http://www.fastestlaps.com/tracks/nordschleife.html](http://www.fastestlaps.com/tracks/nordschleife.html)
> 
> Doesn’t hold the record in it’s own country? Who the fuck cares, really?  
> And if BMW didn’t hold the record, Porsche would with the Panamara Turbo with a 7:56.00 lap time.
> 
> And also, like I couldn’t care less if you lost respect for me, as if I had any respect for you in the first place.
> 
> EDIT: Also, you’re comparing it to the E60 M5, which came out in 2005.

since i know i cant win an argument on shift, I’m not going to bother continuing to argue.

all i WAS saying, is that a 2009 CTS-V is superior to a 2009 M5.

and now, i dont give a fuck.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981)._