# More auto food for thought

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [March 11, 2012, 4:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981 "2012-03-11T16:59:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2012, 5:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981/4 "2012-03-11T17:09:41Z")

</div>

> [@T-mo customers...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/t-mo-customers/48599/18):
>
> Good article. The only things I am concerned about when comparing the MPG of old vs. new is that the testing standards have changed a lot also. Same with comparing us to the European cars. The EPA/CAFE standards are bullshit IMO.

Reading the comments below, the author caught quite a bit of flack for the article from the readers.

I didn’t think it was a bad article myself.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981)._