# More auto food for thought

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive
**Created:** [March 11, 2012, 4:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981 "2012-03-11T16:59:22Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 74

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Alpine](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/4da419/32.png) [@Alpine](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Alpine)
#### Post date: [March 14, 2012, 7:03pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981/74 "2012-03-14T19:03:22Z")

</div>

> [@WTB: SBC heads](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wtb-sbc-heads/48592/9):
>
> In 1988 CRX HF would get 50 or even 60 MPG. Hybrid what?
> 
> Good MPG, Cheap, Safe
> 
> Pick 2.

There are numerous vehicles with 5 star crash safety ratings that get over 40mpg hwy. They’re not expensive, the cruze ECO gets 42mpg highway, has 5 star crash ratings, and is priced under 20 grand.

roflumadbro?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/more-auto-food-for-thought/262981)._
