# Most cost effective setup for 65' stang? **URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734 **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive **Created:** [May 30, 2008, 6:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734 "2008-05-30T06:03:47Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 53
### Author: ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy) #### Post date: [July 19, 2008, 7:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734/53 "2008-07-19T19:29:48Z")
> [@las vegas strip club.....](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/las-vegas-strip-club/37178/6): > > lmao , why am i on shrooms, because a buick small block can make that much with bolt ons, a mild cam and oversized valved and port work? > boat anchor, how, a buick 350 is the lightest iron gm 350 made (450lbs) less with the sheetmetal intake i have, and my cars curb weight it 3500bs…again less with the fiberglass hood and forged al rims… > and whats with the hostility, i was just comparing a buildup i know that works, and shaving off a few hp for a smaller ford v8… line up with a 87-93 mustang 5 speed with weight removed too ~300hp. your 400hp buick willl look like shit and barely win equal drivers if not lose. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734)._