# Most cost effective setup for 65' stang?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [May 30, 2008, 6:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734 "2008-05-30T06:03:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 60

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2008, 7:49pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734/60 "2008-07-20T19:49:55Z")

</div>

> [@Find me this song...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/find-me-this-song/37190/13):
>
> hmm a stock 90 mustang GT weighs around 3400 lbs, a stock 70 skylark(which sports a full frame) weighs 3600-3800 with A/C and other creature comforts. I’d say by your standards the Mustang is nearly a lard ass itself. :stick:

fox body stangs were around 2900 lbs. Where did you get 3400 lbs from?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734)._