# Most cost effective setup for 65' stang? **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [May 30, 2008, 6:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734 "2008-05-30T06:03:47Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 69
**Author:** ![Nothingface5384](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/779978/32.png) [@Nothingface5384](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Nothingface5384)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2008, 2:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734/69 "2008-07-21T14:42:12Z")
> [@Results from NYI 10/14](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/results-from-nyi-10-14/36975/107): > > fox body stangs were around 2900 lbs. Where did you get 3400 lbs from? yep 90 stang shipping weight is 3065 for the hatch 3213 for the conv 72 lark shipping weight is 3436 shipping weight love the “standard catolog of american cars” book --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/most-cost-effective-setup-for-65-stang/197734)._