# Motor Trend: Evo X vs. New Sti

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/motor-trend-evo-x-vs-new-sti/40818>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [December 26, 2007, 7:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/motor-trend-evo-x-vs-new-sti/40818 "2007-12-26T19:02:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sureshot007](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/sureshot007/32/7345_2.png) [@sureshot007](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/sureshot007)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2007, 5:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/motor-trend-evo-x-vs-new-sti/40818/20 "2007-12-27T17:58:38Z")

</div>

I don’t get how they unanimously picked the evo. The STI was faster 0-60, quarter mile, shorter stopping, more power, lighter weight, more cargo room…  
They never actually said what the STI’s lap time was (or I missed it in the article). They must have left the DCCD in auto, since that’s the best way to get it to understeer.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/motor-trend-evo-x-vs-new-sti/40818)._