# Motor Trend: Evo X vs. New Sti

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/motor-trend-evo-x-vs-new-sti/40818>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [December 26, 2007, 7:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/motor-trend-evo-x-vs-new-sti/40818 "2007-12-26T19:02:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 33

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RobHimself](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e480ec/32.png) [@RobHimself](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RobHimself)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2007, 8:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/motor-trend-evo-x-vs-new-sti/40818/33 "2007-12-28T08:35:45Z")

</div>

> [@chino](#):
>
> lol im so confused
> 
> thats pretty true… chalk it up to american assimilation i guess lol
> 
> all of the 2002+ imprezas are heavier than 90’s versions, however this decades designs are pretty similar
> 
> sorry my post was kind of attacking, everyone is bashing a car they’ve never seen or driven - its just getting old 😛

This is true, i have never said the evo wasn’t a performer but it would look better as a galant and not an evo. The sti is just going with the times. They have been getting spanked by hatches so make a hatch…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/motor-trend-evo-x-vs-new-sti/40818)._
