# Movie Review "Untraceable"

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/movie-review-untraceable/42285>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [January 22, 2008, 8:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/movie-review-untraceable/42285 "2008-01-22T20:24:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Justin](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/justin/32/7459_2.png) [@Justin](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Justin)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2008, 8:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/movie-review-untraceable/42285/1 "2008-01-22T20:24:18Z")

</div>

I thought it was pretty good, but this is just coming off of seeing Cloverdale last week :tdown: So I think most movies seem pretty good in comparison. I’m not going to give any details.

Overall I would recommend it, go see it when it comes out. I’d give it an 8/10

[http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/untraceable/](http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/untraceable/)

[http://www.killwithme.com/](http://www.killwithme.com/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OfficerK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/4da419/32.png) [@OfficerK](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OfficerK)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2008, 8:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/movie-review-untraceable/42285/2 "2008-01-22T20:42:48Z")

</div>

is “cloverdale” a sequel or something, never heard of it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bacon](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bacon/32/7230_2.png) [@Bacon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Bacon)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2008, 7:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/movie-review-untraceable/42285/3 "2008-01-23T07:17:45Z")

</div>

Blairfield, whatever.

Anyways it was a quite a good movie surprisingly, had the obvious Hollywood technology issues. But otherwise quite entertaining, think saw meets the internet in a way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![focusinprogress](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/focusinprogress/32/7227_2.png) [@focusinprogress](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/focusinprogress)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2008, 7:37am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/movie-review-untraceable/42285/4 "2008-01-23T07:37:06Z")

</div>

^ well put devon. i was expecting much less. ending was decent, and the plot was just good enough to keep you interested without being TOO predictable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slopoke](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slopoke/32/7248_2.png) [@Slopoke](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Slopoke)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2008, 11:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/movie-review-untraceable/42285/5 "2008-01-24T11:24:47Z")

</div>

agreed wasnt that bad, hope you all had a good time!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ryanmcell](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/ryanmcell/32/7510_2.png) [@ryanmcell](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ryanmcell)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2008, 3:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/movie-review-untraceable/42285/6 "2008-01-24T15:39:31Z")

</div>

> [@FuzzyFish](#):
>
> Blairfield, whatever.
> 
> Anyways it was a quite a good movie surprisingly, had the obvious Hollywood technology issues. But otherwise quite entertaining, think saw meets the internet in a way.

From the commercials I kept saying it looked like Saw meets Feat Dot Com.

Worth $9?