# MSN's New search

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [February 1, 2005, 5:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070 "2005-02-01T05:52:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whitey](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/whitey/32/5911_2.png) [@whitey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/whitey)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2005, 5:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/1 "2005-02-01T05:52:26Z")

</div>

hmmmm… it looks just like Google, but does it work just as good?

Check it out here:  
[http://www.msn.com/](http://www.msn.com/)

after a few search tests it seems to run pretty good, and displaying almost similar results

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2005, 5:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/2 "2005-02-01T05:58:29Z")

</div>

ya…pretty good

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2005, 7:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/3 "2005-02-01T07:36:53Z")

</div>

you want a nice search…go to [www.vivisimo.com](http://www.vivisimo.com)  
the guy that created the clustering search is here in Pgh…by boss is friends with the guy.

it works great…clusters things into groups so for example if your searching for “cancer” you will have clusters for zodiac sign, breast, lung, prostate, etc…

alos helps minimize those random porn sites that pop up in searches.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whitey](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/whitey/32/5911_2.png) [@whitey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/whitey)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2005, 8:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/4 "2005-02-01T08:20:29Z")

</div>

yeah i saw that about a year or two back, nice search engine for sure

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2005, 12:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/5 "2005-02-01T12:13:36Z")

</div>

i thought google was coming out with something like that really really soon

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whitey](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/whitey/32/5911_2.png) [@whitey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/whitey)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2005, 2:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/6 "2005-02-01T14:16:20Z")

</div>

here is what google has coming out… [http://labs.google.com/](http://labs.google.com/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rookee](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rookee/32/5972_2.png) [@rookee](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rookee)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2005, 9:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/7 "2005-02-01T21:33:49Z")

</div>

[www.teoma.com](http://www.teoma.com) pretty accurate too. sometimes if google isn’t hitting well this will

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobby311](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bobby311/32/5971_2.png) [@bobby311](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bobby311)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2005, 2:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/8 "2005-02-03T14:05:05Z")

</div>

google obviously \> \*

vivisimo works well, but why would they make the name soo complicated…  
i mean look at the other sites  
yahoo  
msn  
google  
ask

you get the point

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shaggy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/shaggy/32/5945_2.png) [@Shaggy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shaggy)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2005, 5:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/9 "2005-02-03T17:13:33Z")

</div>

google has its advantages when looking for instant images, I want.  
I’ve been using the one rookee posted and gives better results than google :nuts:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pittbug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/35a633/32.png) [@pittbug](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/pittbug)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2005, 7:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/10 "2005-02-03T19:32:57Z")

</div>

At least msn doesn’t have the sandbox… some of the sites I’ve worked on have jumped up in the rankings quite a bit. Now if they would release an api like google, that’d rock.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rookee](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rookee/32/5972_2.png) [@rookee](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rookee)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2005, 7:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/msns-new-search/172070/11 "2005-02-04T07:50:03Z")

</div>

> [@SHAG](#):
>
> google has its advantages when looking for instant images, I want.  
> I’ve been using the one rookee posted and gives better results than google :nuts:

:eek4dance hater :shaggy: :naughty:
