# Muscle cars

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [July 28, 2006, 2:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871 "2006-07-28T14:47:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 10:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/41 "2006-07-31T10:03:19Z")

</div>

> [@2002SilverWS-6](#):
>
> Trans Am here and well into the 11’s. Is that enough muscle?

mustang and camero are pony cars, not muscle cars. So you could throw a lot more “muscle” into the mix and still not be a muscle car.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 10:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/42 "2006-07-31T10:10:13Z")

</div>

Pony cars are muscle cars  
[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&defl=en&q=define:Muscle+Car&sa=X&oi=glossary\_definition&ct=title](http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&defl=en&q=define:Muscle+Car&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title)

> Definitions of Muscle Car on the Web:
> 
> Sometimes called “Pony Cars” too. Big giant V8 engines with super chargers and special exhaust created these gas-guzzlers that were really fast! Muscle cars reached their epitome in the 1960’s with the advent of the GTO, certain Mustangs, Camaro’s and some Chyrsler models like the Challenger, etc. Unfortunately the “energy crisis” killed this genre of cars.

[http://t-ce.com/muscle-car-models.html](http://t-ce.com/muscle-car-models.html)

So muslce car =oldschool…but there are modern musclecars which some argue are not true muscle cars but I feel they can be classified as american muscle

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 10:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/43 "2006-07-31T10:18:17Z")

</div>

no, and no amount of interweb pages will change that fact. Pony cars are pony cars, not muscle cars.

are pony cars just as desirable and fast as muscle cars, yes, but they are not muscle cars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 10:29am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/44 "2006-07-31T10:29:17Z")

</div>

a true def of a muscle car is a 2 door, large displacement engine, intermediate size car. thats why they call the 64 GTO the first one. GM a-bodys, chrysler b-bodys. etc… modern muscle is something different

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 10:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/45 "2006-07-31T10:30:35Z")

</div>

I see your arguement but if you look at the the definition (not some lame interweb) then f-bodies and stangs would fall into it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 10:33am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/46 "2006-07-31T10:33:11Z")

</div>

that 2nd link had a galaxie as a muscle car and dusters, only with a certain engine. That’s a fucked up list.

pony cars are different than muscle cars, IMHO. I would never consider a camaro a muscle car.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 10:37am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/47 "2006-07-31T10:37:09Z")

</div>

f-bodys are not intermediate size cars. i forgot some of the definition. 2door, RWD, full frame, intermediate size, large displacement. a duster back then was a compact.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gecz28](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/f14d63/32.png) [@Gecz28](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gecz28)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 2:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/48 "2006-07-31T14:47:43Z")

</div>

> [@77rednecktruck](#):
>
> mustang and camero are pony cars, not muscle cars. So you could throw a lot more “muscle” into the mix and still not be a muscle car.

what about the 69 ZL1 Camaro/Yenko Camaro? no muscle there?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bgblockelcamino](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bgblockelcamino/32/5997_2.png) [@bgblockelcamino](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bgblockelcamino)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 2:52pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/49 "2006-07-31T14:52:16Z")

</div>

have an 86 elcamino, had a big block in it. not sure what i am gonna put back into it. have worked on many muscle cars though

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pewter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pewter/32/5936_2.png) [@Pewter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pewter)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 3:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/50 "2006-07-31T15:07:52Z")

</div>

> [@bgblockelcamino](#):
>
> have an 86 elcamino, had a big block in it. i am gonna put a 6.0 into it. have worked on many muscle cars though

:hsdance:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bgblockelcamino](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bgblockelcamino/32/5997_2.png) [@bgblockelcamino](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bgblockelcamino)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 3:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/51 "2006-07-31T15:26:31Z")

</div>

heard junkyard motors run pretty good:D

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 3:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/52 "2006-07-31T15:27:33Z")

</div>

> [@bgblockelcamino](#):
>
> heard junkyard motors run pretty good:D

you heard very well now get a 6.0 and come with it son

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slvr98camaro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7c8e57/32.png) [@slvr98camaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slvr98camaro)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 4:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/53 "2006-07-31T16:08:46Z")

</div>

69 camaro

and i might buy a 72’ chevelle ss

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slvr98camaro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7c8e57/32.png) [@slvr98camaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slvr98camaro)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2006, 4:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/54 "2006-07-31T16:11:35Z")

</div>

> [@Gecz28](#):
>
> what about the 69 ZL1 Camaro/Yenko Camaro? no muscle there?

it depends on who you talk to…

most people say that muscle cars are bigger cars (like the chevelles) with big engines in them.

i personally feel that old camaros, and mustangs are muscle cars… but i will refer to them as pony cars

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gecz28](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/f14d63/32.png) [@Gecz28](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Gecz28)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2006, 5:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/55 "2006-08-01T05:18:41Z")

</div>

heres ours  
both mid size, both semi big motor

68 442 vert ![http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/6/web/486000-486999/486133_23.jpg](http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/6/web/486000-486999/486133_23.jpg)  
65 Olds F85 **4 SALE**![http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/6/web/486000-486999/486133_12.jpg](http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/6/web/486000-486999/486133_12.jpg) **4 SALE**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Silver\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@Silver\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Silver_SS)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2006, 7:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/56 "2006-08-01T07:23:13Z")

</div>

> [@Gecz28](#):
>
> your dad HAD a yenko nova??? :wackit:  
> werent those the rarest yenkos?  
> i bet u hes kicking himself in the ass for letting it go!  
> as much as i dont like the later,“more popular” novas, who wouldnt like anything Yenko? even the corvair!
> 
> gotta love the locals making some of the baddest ass muscle cars!!!

yea he doe’s but what can you do. it was forrest green with a black vinal top/ bench seat with a 4 speed. he spun a rod bearing in the original motor and put a 454 from a 70 chevelle(not an ls6) in it. then he scraped the 427. the motor’s alone are worth an ass load

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Silver\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@Silver\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Silver_SS)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2006, 7:26am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/57 "2006-08-01T07:26:54Z")

</div>

jeff go with the 6.0 and sell the BB. everybody has a bb el camino but not a 6.0 el camino

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MONTE\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8797f3/32.png) [@MONTE\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MONTE_SS)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2006, 10:32am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/58 "2006-08-01T10:32:32Z")

</div>

how about the 80’s cars, 305/350 was a large displacement for that time being, in stock from the factory terms. Or is that when they where starting to turn into sports cars?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MONTE\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8797f3/32.png) [@MONTE\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MONTE_SS)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2006, 10:33am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/59 "2006-08-01T10:33:43Z")

</div>

or can one build a muscle car, 2 door full frame, passanger car, with large displacement?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![95V8TBird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/9/a8b319/32.png) [@95V8TBird](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/95V8TBird)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2006, 10:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871/60 "2006-08-01T10:45:02Z")

</div>

66 Chevelle Post Car (300 Deleuxe), with a BUILT 396…pushin close to 600hp…that considered muscle??  
 ![http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y230/euphoria717/chevelle1.jpg](http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y230/euphoria717/chevelle1.jpg)

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muscle-cars/183871.md?page=4)
