# Mustang concept **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [November 28, 2006, 7:08am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776 "2006-11-28T07:08:35Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 16\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![camarojoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c67d28/32.png) [@camarojoe](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/camarojoe)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 8:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/21 "2006-11-28T08:01:23Z")
> [@elgarvo616](#): > > why is it that all the american car designers are going retro but all the japs are going more futuristic? We’re stuck in the past. Plus that is when our cars were cool. ---
**Author:** ![Mike93](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/mike93/32/7325_2.png) [@Mike93](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mike93)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 8:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/22 "2006-11-28T08:05:32Z")
> [@elgarvo616](#): > > why is it that all the american car designers are going retro but all the japs are going more futuristic? This specific car came from an Italian design studio working jointly with Ford…[http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2006/top-secret-giugiaro-mustang-concept-spotted/](http://www.mustangblog.com/index.php/2006/top-secret-giugiaro-mustang-concept-spotted/) ---
**Author:** ![fbrendan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d26b3c/32.png) [@fbrendan](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fbrendan)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 8:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/23 "2006-11-28T08:10:54Z")
I like it. :tup: Minus the doors and the seats. They seem so out of place. :gotme: I like the tails too for some reason. ---
**Author:** ![focusinprogress](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/focusinprogress/32/7227_2.png) [@focusinprogress](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/focusinprogress)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 8:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/24 "2006-11-28T08:53:12Z")
> [@FuzzyFish](#): > > I rather like it, The concave curve on the back looks a bit out of place though. Also the lack of a functional hood, or trunk is a problem. i agree with this smart man 110%…the tailights need to go, and the rear section needs to be less concave. other that that i really like the way it looks, well, exept the ugly horse print seats EDIT: oh yea, and the lambo doors can :gtfo: ---
**Author:** ![Fry](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fry/32/7284_2.png) [@Fry](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Fry)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 9:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/25 "2006-11-28T09:58:06Z")
Exterior looks like a 4G Eclipse. Interior looks like a horse fucked an airplane. 2004 is still the last Mustang that I like. ---
**Author:** ![amd3dnow3](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/amd3dnow3/32/7410_2.png) [@amd3dnow3](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/amd3dnow3)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 10:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/26 "2006-11-28T10:03:02Z")
lol a stang with lambo doors from factory, but the desing is not that bad just a bit weird ---
**Author:** ![raven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9fc348/32.png) [@raven](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/raven)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 10:43am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/27 "2006-11-28T10:43:26Z")
Why do Mustang rear ends looks so bad? ---
**Author:** ![bladez](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bladez/32/7237_2.png) [@bladez](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bladez)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 10:52am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/28 "2006-11-28T10:52:27Z")
some aren’t that bad 😉 ---
**Author:** ![TrueBlue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/trueblue/32/7245_2.png) [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 11:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/29 "2006-11-28T11:01:07Z")
> [@bladez](#): > > some aren’t that bad 😉 x 3563748393.32 ---
**Author:** ![jltalon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/6a8cbe/32.png) [@jltalon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/jltalon)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 11:09am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/30 "2006-11-28T11:09:11Z")
Who cares what it looks like…it will still be too heavy and slow!!! ---
**Author:** ![raven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9fc348/32.png) [@raven](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/raven)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 11:25am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/31 "2006-11-28T11:25:52Z")
My gripe is that the recent mustang has a great look (albeit it still looks boatish) but the rear end is so plain. It further acentuates the boat look making the rear end of the car look tall and plain. The concept has pretty interesting tail lights, but once again, the bumper is very plain. Its not even vanilla plain, it is just milk with ice. The front end is a pretty cool take. Too much glass in my opinion, but it has a nice ground hugging look. =/ ---
**Author:** ![87FOXGT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/8/ecd19e/32.png) [@87FOXGT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/87FOXGT)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 11:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/32 "2006-11-28T11:45:25Z")
dont like it. but then again i think all mustangs suck :gotme: ---
**Author:** ![jeeves744](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jeeves744/32/7619_2.png) [@jeeves744](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/jeeves744)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 12:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/33 "2006-11-28T12:37:51Z")
i dont know if its the color or what, but the front end reminds me of the new eclipse. Im really not feeling it at all. I still feel the best style were the 03-04ish style ---
**Author:** ![Pass\_McGass](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/pass_mcgass/32/7616_2.png) [@Pass\_McGass](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Pass_McGass)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 1:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/34 "2006-11-28T13:35:33Z")
> [@brendansi](#): > > I like the tails too for some reason. me too. it’s different and i bet they look pretty sweet in person. ---
**Author:** ![2TurboZ](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/2turboz/32/7577_2.png) [@2TurboZ](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/2TurboZ)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 1:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/35 "2006-11-28T13:41:09Z")
Meh…it wont look like that anyway. Ford constantly toys with the mustang platform and very rarely does production mirror concept. ---
**Author:** ![Boarderx192](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b782af/32.png) [@Boarderx192](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boarderx192)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2006, 1:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776/36 "2006-11-28T13:42:29Z")
Kinda reminds me of the new M coupe. [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mustang-concept/20776.md?page=1)