# Muwahahahah!  Holy shit!

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muwahahahah-holy-shit/267765>\
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\
**Created:** [September 23, 2013, 3:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muwahahahah-holy-shit/267765 "2013-09-23T15:27:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2013, 5:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muwahahahah-holy-shit/267765/11 "2013-09-24T05:07:32Z")

</div>

> [@caught someone stealing today](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/caught-someone-stealing-today/53393/24):
>
> just cause the sign isn’t in code doesn’t mean that a cop can legally destroy it…but people thinking the cop should/would be fired over this are out of their mind.

“When a local government enacts a sign regulation, it is likely that  
some existing signs will not conform to the new regulations. Local  
sign regulations should address existing signs, particularly those that  
do not conform to newly enacted regulations. A lawfully existing sign  
that does not conform to new sign regulation may be treated as a prior  
nonconforming use, and allowed to remain provided it is not altered.  
Alternately, the **municipality may attempt to have them removed**.”

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muwahahahah-holy-shit/267765)._