# Muwahahahah!  Holy shit!

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muwahahahah-holy-shit/267765>\
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\
**Created:** [September 23, 2013, 3:27pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muwahahahah-holy-shit/267765 "2013-09-23T15:27:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 26

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slwrthnu](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slwrthnu/32/6296_2.png) [@slwrthnu](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slwrthnu)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2013, 7:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muwahahahah-holy-shit/267765/26 "2013-09-24T07:03:21Z")

</div>

> [@Drinkers Step In/How Often You Drink](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/drinkers-step-in-how-often-you-drink/53428/103):
>
> “When a local government enacts a sign regulation, it is likely that  
> some existing signs will not conform to the new regulations. Local  
> sign regulations should address existing signs, particularly those that  
> do not conform to newly enacted regulations. A lawfully existing sign  
> that does not conform to new sign regulation may be treated as a prior  
> nonconforming use, and allowed to remain provided it is not altered.  
> Alternately, the **municipality may attempt to have them removed**.”

so still where in that does it allow a cop to come and destroy your property?

oh btw, that is talking about a sign that was legal, then became illegal due to a new regulation, so was the sign in question once legal?

btw i haven’t read the thread, or am going to read up on it, bc i really don’t care and it’s more amusing to point out the holes in your case as your trying to play the other side and see you then trying to find something that backs you up.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/muwahahahah-holy-shit/267765)._