# my impressions
**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic
**Created:** [November 17, 2009, 6:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443 "2009-11-17T18:02:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 2
### Author:  [@DUKE\_LADUKE](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DUKE_LADUKE)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/21 "2009-11-17T18:15:51Z")
F\*CK YOUR
.2
---
### Author:  [@tdi\_logik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tdi_logik)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/22 "2009-11-17T18:16:41Z")
the v6 cameo’s go like 95 in the quater the GT’s do like 105-106 iirc… the cameo’s gonna be dunzo.
---
### Author:  [@PJB](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/PJB)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/23 "2009-11-17T18:17:34Z")
> [@FS:2001 MERCEDES BENZ ML320](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-2001-mercedes-benz-ml320/25976/2):
>
> no paul. new V6 camaro did 14.5 @ 99 via car and driver.
I thought I read 14.7 in anothr magazine. Either way its still most likely going to get beat by a stock Mustang GT and really it should.
---
### Author:  [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/24 "2009-11-17T18:17:39Z")
Thread backfire!!! :ahh
---
### Author:  [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/25 "2009-11-17T18:18:08Z")
> [@DUKE LADUKE"](#):
>
> F\*CK YOUR
> .2
you got 1 car on a V6 camaro from a roll?? so the civic is good for 100mph in the 1/4?
---
### Author:  [@PJB](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/PJB)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/26 "2009-11-17T18:18:28Z")
> [@tdi\_logik"](#):
>
> the v6 cameo’s go like 95 in the quater the GT’s do like 105-106 iirc… the cameo’s gonna be dunzo.
I dont think they run that fast. Thats low 13’s/high 12’s at that mph with a good driver.
---
### Author:  [@Mike3](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mike3)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/27 "2009-11-17T18:18:29Z")
yea, via car and driver
The ones I saw at LVD this year were consistent 15’s _maybe_ a high 14 but not often. However I have no idea if they were auto/6spd whatever. [Dragtimes.com](http://Dragtimes.com) has then from 14.3-145@97-98 (all 6spds). Not bad for a v6 I guess, but still my POS 97 190rwhp runs the same times.
Oh and FUCK FORD for having the GT being even remotely competitive with Chevy’s v6.
---
### Author:  [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/28 "2009-11-17T18:18:47Z")
> [@should i buy this?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/should-i-buy-this/25974/14):
>
> the manual trans V6 camaro has an LSD = big burnout
thats pretty cool. standard or with some kind of package?
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/29 "2009-11-17T18:19:10Z")
> [@Mk4 30R"](#):
>
> you got 1 car on a V6 camaro from a roll?? so the civic is good for 100mph in the 1/4?
my point :lol
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/30 "2009-11-17T18:19:55Z")
> [@Have you ever used the remote for your car's head unit?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/have-you-ever-used-the-remote-for-your-cars-head-unit/25977/5):
>
> yea, via car and driver
>
> The ones I saw at LVD this year were consistent 15’s _maybe_ a high 14 but not often. However I have no idea if they were auto/6spd whatever. [Dragtimes.com](http://Dragtimes.com) has then from 14.3-145@97-98 (all 6spds). Not bad for a v6 I guess, but still my POS 97 190rwhp runs the same times.
>
> Oh and FUCK FORD for having the GT being even remotely competitive with Chevy’s v6.
quoted for the last sentance :lol
---
### Author:  [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/31 "2009-11-17T18:19:58Z")
> [@Have you ever used the remote for your car's head unit?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/have-you-ever-used-the-remote-for-your-cars-head-unit/25977/5):
>
> but still my POS 97 190rwhp runs the same times.
190?? maybe at the crank… that slug is 155whp. :lol
---
### Author:  [@Mike3](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mike3)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/32 "2009-11-17T18:20:21Z")
HAHA ass.
---
### Author:  [@tdi\_logik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/tdi_logik)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/33 "2009-11-17T18:20:25Z")
screw the new cameo. i’ll take a new genesis 2.0T coupe with the track package instead!
---
### Author:  [@Mk4\_30R\_Ban](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Mk4_30R_Ban)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/34 "2009-11-17T18:20:50Z")
> [@What Does 1000 lb ft Look Like?.....](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-does-1000-lb-ft-look-like/25958/75):
>
> thats pretty cool. standard or with some kind of package?
standard with 6MT cars, the 6AT are open diff on V6’s
all V8s have LSD’s
---
### Author:  [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/35 "2009-11-17T18:20:52Z")
> [@FS:2001 MERCEDES BENZ ML320](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-2001-mercedes-benz-ml320/25976/3):
>
> I dont think they run that fast. Thats low 13’s/high 12’s at that mph with a good driver.
They run low 13’s stock
> [@Have you ever used the remote for your car's head unit?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/have-you-ever-used-the-remote-for-your-cars-head-unit/25977/5):
>
> Oh and FUCK FORD for having the GT being even remotely competitive with Chevy’s v6.
But we sell cars, and continue to!
---
### Author:  [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/36 "2009-11-17T18:21:41Z")
> [@FS:2001 MERCEDES BENZ ML320](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-2001-mercedes-benz-ml320/25976/2):
>
> no paul. new V6 camaro did 14.5 @ 99 via car and driver.
impressive, the same as a fwd v6 econosedan.
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/37 "2009-11-17T18:21:54Z")
> [@should i buy this?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/should-i-buy-this/25974/23):
>
> They run low 13’s stock
>
> But we sell cars, and continue to! even though they are slow
quoted for troof
---
### Author:  [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/38 "2009-11-17T18:22:13Z")
:rofl Prick!
---
### Author:  [@88slowmarro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/88slowmarro)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/39 "2009-11-17T18:22:50Z")
lolololo
---
### Author:  [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2009, 6:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443/40 "2009-11-17T18:23:32Z")
Sad that our 300hp car runs within .2tenths of a 400hp car though…
[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443.md?page=1)
[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-impressions/248443.md?page=3)