# my incident at tims **URL:** \ **Category:** SON240sx Automotive\ **Created:** [October 28, 2009, 8:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-incident-at-tims/129166 "2009-10-28T08:12:47Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 127
**Author:** ![P.Ruddy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ee59a6/32.png) [@P.Ruddy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/P.Ruddy)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2009, 9:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-incident-at-tims/129166/127 "2009-11-03T09:31:54Z")
> [@Funny NHL Commercial](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/funny-nhl-commercial/24644/2): > > Canada doesn’t have Miranda rights. The officer has to inform you of the charge, inform you of your right to obtain counse, and make sure that you understand that. Seems that the officer met the bare minimum. Circumstantional evidence doesn’t meet the requirements of actus reus and mens rea though. Those tire marks will not be fresh, like fresh that day mostl likely. There most likely will not be any witnesses to corrobarate with the officers testimony. Overall, this case seems week. Unfortunately the cop wins to some degree because he gets paid for court, you don’t. You absolutly have the right to know why you are being arrested, you then have the right to be infomred of your right and then be cautioned. It’s called ARC arrest, rights, caution. As soon as you are in cuffs and you are made safe (weapons, means of escape) you are to be infomred why. Being notified after you are released, being interviewed by various cops that did not proivide a secondary warning is a viloation of your rights making almost everything inadmisable. Yes the case is weak, and the cop only gets overtime if it isn’t on his regular shift. If found innocent you may be able to file for recovering lost wages, this I’m not sure of. As for the cop meeting the bare minimum, I don’t see anywhere in that write up where that is done. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-incident-at-tims/129166)._